Teams

V - Las Posas Highballs

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WE · Ventura - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-03vs V - Sherwood StarletsWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Howey / J Chen vs Lindsey Hansen / Lucia Park6-2, 6-2
2023-12-02vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Howey / Manuela St Jean vs Debra Myrent / Anne Renard6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-12vs V - WACtown GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Howey / Manuela St Jean vs Lauren Ruitberg / Hannah Buehring6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMaureen Finnigan / Gina Howey vs Justine Abbitt / Pamela Hellenbrand6-1, 6-2
2023-10-15vs V - Pierpont RacquettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Howey / Manuela St Jean vs Michelle Duddy / Nicolette Villa5-7, 4-6
2023-10-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesGina Howey / Manuela St Jean vs Cynthia Clark / Linda Egan6-2, 6-3
2023-10-01vs V - Malibu Loosely StrungLost 01
L#3 DoublesGina Howey / Penny Teague vs Zhara Astra / Emerald Hammerstein0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Krista Howard
published
3.00
Manuela St Jean
published
2.89
Maureen Finnigan
published
2.75
Gina Howey
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
published
2.60
Carol Pollock
published 3
2.60
Mary Nash
published
2.54
Catalina Wise
published 3
2.51
Susan Custance
published
2.51
J Chen
published
2.34
Teresa James
published
2.27
Penny Teague
published
Theresa Yamamoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Finnigan + Gina Howey4156% gamesnot enough data
J Chen + Patty Bolland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Howard
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Manuela St Jean
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Maureen Finnigan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Catalina Wise
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
J Chen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Teresa James
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.34
Penny Teague
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
Theresa Yamamoto
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.