Teams

Bonita National - Wharton

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-05vs COLLIER/Schaufus/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Cirillo / Audra DiDonato vs Jodi Schaufus / Lisa Campbell6-4, 6-2
2024-11-24vs Pelican Landing - D'OlimpioLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Cirillo / Audra DiDonato vs PAMELA ARBOGAST / Ellen Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Mills / Jane Doe vs Linda Snowden-Kraftzenk / Ann White4-6, 5-7
2024-11-21vs Olde Cypress - NavarroWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Cirillo / Audra DiDonato vs Susanne Navarro / Brenda Bensmiller6-4, 6-2
2024-11-14vs Pelican Bay South - BrooksLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Larsen / Audra DiDonato vs Amy Enxing / Risa Martinelli3-6, 1-6
2024-10-31vs Island Walk - SchmidtWon 10
W#3 DoublesJane Mills / Susan Lindberg vs Judith Davis / Laura Haney2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-24vs Pelican Bay North - HowardWon 10
W#3 DoublesAudra DiDonato / Jane Mills vs Rita Chimel / Tara Porte2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-17vs Valencia Bonita - L. SteuererLost 01
L#3 DoublesJane Doe / Audra DiDonato vs Rita Leone / Patricia Doran3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Lisa Fontanini
published
3.46
Laura Cirillo
published
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Audra DiDonato
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Susan Lindberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ellen DiLeo
published 3
Janice Forner
published
Kathy Bagnuolo
published
Teresa Regelmann
published
Terri Higgins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Cirillo + Terri Higgins3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Fontanini
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Laura Cirillo
21W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Audra DiDonato
94W–159L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Susan Lindberg
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Ellen DiLeo
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janice Forner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Bagnuolo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Regelmann
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Higgins
30W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.