Teams

Olde Cypress - Navarro

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2024-12-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Michelle Maggal vs Carol Cohen / Caroline Rogers7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-12-02vs COLLIER/Werchek/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Lori Caple vs Bernadette Devoe / Margaret Werchek6-3, 6-2
2024-11-21vs Bonita National - WhartonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Smith / Kathleen Iverson vs Lisa Fontanini / Diane Mancini5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Brenda Bensmiller vs Laura Cirillo / Audra DiDonato4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Heckert / Linda Boyd vs Janice Forner / Susan Lindberg4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-19vs COLLIER/Schaufus/55&Over7.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Heckert / Kathleen Iverson vs Dana Sacks / Sarah Griffin2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Linda Boyd vs Dana Bursch / Margaret Garofalo6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-14vs Players Club - KropkoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Cheryl Toth vs Marcia Leonard / Lisa McNichol3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Michelle Maggal vs Beth Kropko / Ann McDonald6-0, 6-4
2024-11-07vs Pelican Landing - D'OlimpioWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Bensmiller / Angela Aline vs Rebecca Matarazzi / PAMELA ARBOGAST6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Michelle Maggal vs Tammy Street / Karen Leenheers6-0, 6-1
2024-11-04vs Naples Reserve- HugginsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Gina Taft vs JANE BRUDERS / Nyra Rohskopf6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristen Catino / Michelle Maggal vs Barb Bevenour / Tricia McBride6-7, 4-6
2024-10-30vs Longshore Lake - PallerWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Diana Heckert vs Clarissa Valdivia / Lynn Damico6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAngela Aline / Brenda Bensmiller vs Terina Korda / Susan Weinman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Toth / Kathleen Iverson vs Debra Fischer / Elsie Jerozal5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Gina Taft vs Alicia Kennaugh / Annette Brennan6-4, 7-6
2024-10-28vs Pelican Bay North - StrakoschWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Gina Taft vs Stacia Van Slyke / Susan Levine6-3, 6-2
2024-10-24vs Valencia Bonita - L. SteuererWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathleen Iverson / Michelle Maggal vs Roberta Lewis / Patricia Arthur6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Brenda Bensmiller vs Shirley Yagoda / Patricia Doran6-1, 6-3
2024-10-21vs Island Country Club - MillerLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Lori Caple vs Missy Kuklenski / Suzanne Messere6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Brenda Bensmiller vs Renee Facciola / Connie Johnson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Diana Heckert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Susanne Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.32
Kathleen Iverson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Brenda Bensmiller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Angela Aline
published 3.5
3.12
Libby Eckert
published
Linda Boyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Bensmiller + Michelle Maggal191655% games−2.0% vs expected
Michelle Maggal + Susanne Navarro5257% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Iverson + Diana Heckert5160% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Bensmiller + Susanne Navarro2347% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Iverson + Michelle Maggal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana Heckert
165W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Kathleen Iverson
50W–73L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Brenda Bensmiller
64W–84L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Angela Aline
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Libby Eckert
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.12
Linda Boyd
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.