Teams

Porr Some More Please

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 4.27 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-13vs PTSAWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Peterson / Gina Sharp vs Suzanna Murali / Vanessa Almaraz7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJessie Maimer vs Leiana Almaraz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-08vs TerminettersLost 02
L#1 DoublesGina Sharp / Erin Peterson vs Jo Ann Kurz / Debbie Wachtell1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKerri Porritt / Christine Reeds vs Kathy Brashear / Laura Larsen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-07-07vs PTSALost 02
L#1 DoublesHeidi Maimer / Kerri Porritt vs Emily Tesnohlidek / Emily Thomas5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesErin Peterson / Gina Sharp vs Leiana Almaraz / Shelley Ware3-6, 4-6
2021-07-01vs TerminettersLost 12
W#1 SinglesChristine Reeds vs Joelle Staley6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGina Sharp / Erin Peterson vs Kathy Brashear / Laura Larsen1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJayme Sullivan / Heidi Maimer vs Jo Ann Kurz / Susan Hopkey4-6, 3-6
2021-06-22vs TerminettersLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Little / Carmen Little vs Rachel Kincheloe / Jody Mallane2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErin Peterson / Gina Sharp vs Laura Larsen / Kathy Brashear7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Reeds / Lisa Sliger vs Jami Garver / Becca Longson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-15vs PTSALost 12
W#1 SinglesChristine Reeds vs Vanessa Almaraz6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHalle Alexander / Heidi Maimer vs Victoria Hildebrand / Hanna Jacobs6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJessie Maimer vs Taylor Johnson2-6, 3-6
2021-06-08vs TerminettersLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Little / Carmen Little vs Bobette Wood / Kathy Brashear5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessie Maimer / Heidi Maimer vs Rachel Kincheloe / Jody Mallane3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesErin Peterson / Gina Sharp vs Jami Garver / Debbie Wachtell2-6, 4-6
2021-06-03vs PTSASplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Reeds / Jessica Jensen vs Shelley Ware / Leiana Almaraz1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Maimer / Kelley Canning vs Victoria Hildebrand / Terry Hardy6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PTSA26172348374
2Porr Some More Please26103065446

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Lisa Sliger
published 4.5
Christine Reeds
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Gina Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Heidi Maimer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Jennifer Wong
published
3.99
Kerri Porritt
published 4.5
3.97
Carmen Little
published 4.5
3.92
Jessica Jensen
published
3.87
Kelley Canning
published 4
3.84
Diana Gastanaga
published 4
3.80
Jayme Sullivan
published 4
Erin Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Linda Western
published 4
Halle Alexander
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Jessie Maimer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Natalie Little
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Porritt + Erin Peterson20664% games+7.7% vs expected
Linda Western + Diana Gastanaga8452% games−3.4% vs expected
Diana Gastanaga + Kelley Canning16855% games−7.9% vs expected
Gina Sharp + Erin Peterson161551% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Little + Natalie Little101848% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Maimer + Jayme Sullivan61045% gamesnot enough data
Linda Western + Kelley Canning7158% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Little + Heidi Maimer4269% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lisa Sliger
141W–87L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Christine Reeds
43W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Gina Sharp
79W–63L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Heidi Maimer
51W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Wong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Kerri Porritt
126W–66L career · no lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
3.99
4.5
Carmen Little
70W–64L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.97
Jessica Jensen
84W–78L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Kelley Canning
164W–107L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Diana Gastanaga
121W–79L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Jayme Sullivan
49W–57L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erin Peterson
48W–47L career · type M · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Linda Western
105W–83L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Halle Alexander
70W–50L career · 16 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jessie Maimer
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Little
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.