Teams

Brevard/Woods/18&Over2.5W

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Spring · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-28vs Kiwi - BurkeWon 20
W#1 DoublesCyndi Mcdougall / Jenifer Raymond vs Anne Burns / Lisa Sexton6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCheryl Toth / Joanne Ludwig vs Emily Burke / Dana Chesser6-0, 6-1
2025-05-21vs EFSC - ArcherWon 20
W#1 DoublesEileen Bentley / Jenifer Raymond vs Alix Amozig / Elizabeth Thorne6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Moorhead / Linda Mesnard vs Mackenzie Sloan / Brianna Stevens6-0, 6-2
2025-04-30vs Fee - PriorWon 20
W#1 DoublesEileen Bentley / Anna Marie Pippett vs Courtney McCaleb / Anna van Staagen7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoanne Ludwig / Cheryl Toth vs Madeline Calise / Nicole Kendrick6-1, 6-0
2025-04-23vs Kiwi - BurkeWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrenda Tarquinio / Lael Woods vs Dana Chesser / Edna Chism6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAllison Moorhead vs Tera Schroeder6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Lasko / Linda Mesnard vs Emily Burke / Stacy Konrad6-2, 6-3
2025-04-16vs EFSC - ArcherWon 20
W#1 DoublesEileen Bentley / Allison Moorhead vs Mackenzie Sloan / Calli Ohlin6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Marie Pippett / Linda Mesnard vs Daniella Archer / Alix Amozig6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Brenda Tarquinio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Allison Moorhead
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Stephanie Lasko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Cyndi Mcdougall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Eileen Bentley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Jenifer Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Lael Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Anna Marie Pippett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.34
Linda Mesnard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Joanne Ludwig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lael Woods + Stephanie Lasko1440% gamesnot enough data
Lael Woods + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Allison Moorhead
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Stephanie Lasko
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Cyndi Mcdougall
20W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Eileen Bentley
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Jenifer Raymond
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.53
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Anna Marie Pippett
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Linda Mesnard
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Joanne Ludwig
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.