Teams

KY/LEX/Fakharpour-Begley

2024 USTA FALL LEAGUE 55 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-11vs KY/LEX/SimpsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Monica Mullins vs Olive Gallagher / Emily Diehl0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Littrell / Jana Brooking vs Regina Covington / Elizabeth Doss6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMiemie Dorfling / Amy Luchsinger vs Rhonda Hilton / Kathy Robinson6-4, 6-3
2024-12-06vs KY/LEX/SimpsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMonica Mullins / Miemie Dorfling vs Anne West / Olive Gallagher6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSienna Hooper / Kay Yates vs Toni Halley / Regina Covington6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBetty Grey / Mary Ferlan vs Diana Simpson / Amy Schenck6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-18vs KY/LEX/SimpsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesJana Brooking / Lynn Littrell vs Vivian Esteve / Emily Diehl2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMiemie Dorfling / Kay Yates vs Lola Baker / Karen Sandberg6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSally Baker / Mary Fakharpour vs Phylis Pendleton / Regina Covington4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-11vs KY/LEX/SimpsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesNina Begley / Mary Diggins vs Emily Diehl / Karen Sandberg3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Luchsinger / Leslie Nuckols vs Kathy Robinson / Rhonda Hilton6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetty Grey / Mary Ferlan vs Amy Schenck / Phylis Pendleton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-08vs KY/LEX/SimpsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Littrell / Jana Brooking vs Amy Schenck / Toni Halley6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMendy Blair / Sally Baker vs Phylis Pendleton / Elizabeth Doss5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLeslie Nuckols / Mary Fakharpour vs Victoria Greenwell / Anne West3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-01vs KY/LEX/SimpsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Mullins / Nina Begley vs Vivian Esteve / Karen Sandberg6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSienna Hooper / Amy Luchsinger vs Lola Baker / Emily Diehl4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ferlan / Miemie Dorfling vs Victoria Greenwell / Kathy Robinson6-2, 6-4
2024-10-03vs KY/LEX/SimpsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Amy Luchsinger vs Emily Diehl / Olive Gallagher6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJana Brooking / Monica Mullins vs Lola Baker / Monica Mestanza6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBetty Grey / Nina Begley vs Vivian Esteve / Rhonda Hilton2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Jana Brooking
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Lynn Littrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Monica Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Luchsinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Mary Diggins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Mary Ferlan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Betty Grey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Sally Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Leslie Nuckols
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kay Yates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Fakharpour
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mendy Blair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Miemie Dorfling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nina Begley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sienna Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Littrell + Jana Brooking6552% games−3.8% vs expected
Mary Ferlan + Betty Grey404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fakharpour + Betty Grey044 matchesnot enough data
Mary Diggins + Nina Begley033 matchesnot enough data
Monica Mullins + Nina Begley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jana Brooking
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Lynn Littrell
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Monica Mullins
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Luchsinger
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Diggins
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mary Ferlan
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Betty Grey
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sally Baker
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.02
Leslie Nuckols
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.98
Kay Yates
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Fakharpour
3W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mendy Blair
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Miemie Dorfling
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nina Begley
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sienna Hooper
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.