Teams

KY/LEX/Simpson

2024 USTA FALL LEAGUE 55 & Over · 3.5 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-11vs KY/LEX/Fakharpour-BegleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Emily Diehl vs Mary Diggins / Monica Mullins6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRegina Covington / Elizabeth Doss vs Lynn Littrell / Jana Brooking1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Kathy Robinson vs Miemie Dorfling / Amy Luchsinger4-6, 3-6
2024-12-06vs KY/LEX/Fakharpour-BegleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne West / Olive Gallagher vs Monica Mullins / Miemie Dorfling0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesToni Halley / Regina Covington vs Sienna Hooper / Kay Yates4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Simpson / Amy Schenck vs Betty Grey / Mary Ferlan1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-11-18vs KY/LEX/Fakharpour-BegleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesVivian Esteve / Emily Diehl vs Jana Brooking / Lynn Littrell6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLola Baker / Karen Sandberg vs Miemie Dorfling / Kay Yates4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPhylis Pendleton / Regina Covington vs Sally Baker / Mary Fakharpour6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-11-11vs KY/LEX/Fakharpour-BegleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Karen Sandberg vs Nina Begley / Mary Diggins6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Robinson / Rhonda Hilton vs Amy Luchsinger / Leslie Nuckols0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Schenck / Phylis Pendleton vs Betty Grey / Mary Ferlan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-08vs KY/LEX/Fakharpour-BegleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Schenck / Toni Halley vs Lynn Littrell / Jana Brooking1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPhylis Pendleton / Elizabeth Doss vs Mendy Blair / Sally Baker7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesVictoria Greenwell / Anne West vs Leslie Nuckols / Mary Fakharpour6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-01vs KY/LEX/Fakharpour-BegleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesVivian Esteve / Karen Sandberg vs Monica Mullins / Nina Begley3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLola Baker / Emily Diehl vs Sienna Hooper / Amy Luchsinger6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVictoria Greenwell / Kathy Robinson vs Mary Ferlan / Miemie Dorfling2-6, 4-6
2024-10-03vs KY/LEX/Fakharpour-BegleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Olive Gallagher vs Mary Diggins / Amy Luchsinger7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLola Baker / Monica Mestanza vs Jana Brooking / Monica Mullins2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVivian Esteve / Rhonda Hilton vs Betty Grey / Nina Begley6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Emily Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Olive Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Karen Sandberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Regina Covington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Phylis Pendleton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Anne West
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Amy Schenck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Monica Mestanza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Diana Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Toni Halley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Doss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lola Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Greenwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vivian Esteve
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Simpson + Regina Covington1538% games+1.9% vs expected
Toni Halley + Regina Covington1442% games−2.7% vs expected
Regina Covington + Monica Mestanza134 matchesnot enough data
Emily Diehl + Olive Gallagher404 matchesnot enough data
Diana Simpson + Toni Halley033 matchesnot enough data
Diana Simpson + Amy Schenck033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Doss + Regina Covington213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Doss + Amy Schenck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Olive Gallagher
13W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Karen Sandberg
5W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Regina Covington
16W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Phylis Pendleton
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Anne West
36W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Rhonda Hilton
39W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Amy Schenck
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Monica Mestanza
5W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Diana Simpson
6W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Toni Halley
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Elizabeth Doss
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lola Baker
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Greenwell
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vivian Esteve
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.