Teams

SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#2 DoublesGina Chen / Chamane Ifland vs Jacynthe Hamel / Maureen Healy6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChamane Ifland / Christeta Gonzalez vs Joanne Wakerlin / Cheryl Sweeney6-3, 6-2
2022-05-03vs GREEN VALLEY CC 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesChamane Ifland / JoAnn Clark vs Courtney Bock / Katie Pietrowski7-6, 6-3
2022-04-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesChamane Ifland vs Holly Brown6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Raquel Barrera
published
3.59
JoAnn Clark
published
3.44
Chamane Ifland
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 4
3.43
Gina Chen
published 4
3.40
Monica Ravanello
published
3.33
Helen Dangtran
published 3.5
3.30
Christeta Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.30
Elizabeth Tong
published 3.5
3.21
Lory Morar
published
3.21
Swaran Williams
published
3.20
Gloria Spencer
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Orellana
published
3.07
Lana McAllister
published
2.98
Cynthia Oanes
published 3.5
2.88
Bobbi Jacoby
published 3
Leslee Fowler
published
Robyn Sickler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lory Morar + Gloria Spencer4446% games−0.3% vs expected
Raquel Barrera + Gloria Spencer213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Tong + Monica Ravanello123 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Spencer + Monica Ravanello123 matchesnot enough data
Helen Dangtran + Monica Ravanello303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raquel Barrera
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.62
JoAnn Clark
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Chamane Ifland
107W–54L career · 10 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Gina Chen
27W–19L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.43
Monica Ravanello
26W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Helen Dangtran
17W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Christeta Gonzalez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Tong
19W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Lory Morar
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Swaran Williams
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gloria Spencer
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Nancy Orellana
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lana McAllister
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cynthia Oanes
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Andrea Li Fen Hsu
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Bobbi Jacoby
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslee Fowler
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robyn Sickler
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.