Teams

GAC PINK

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs EM REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Sarah Younggren vs Jen Fornstrom / Tammy Terhaar0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatsy Botts / Tracy Sickels vs Rebecca Winslow / Meg Overstake4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-10vs SKY REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Sarah Younggren vs Erika Sabatos / Kate Dillon1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCori Murphy / Tracy Sickels vs Shelley Jewell / Melissa Cantu1-6, 3-6
2023-07-03vs CACM BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKay Christensen / Tracy Sickels vs Camille Ford / Lesleigh Anderson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Cori Murphy vs Sarah Stavros / Jimmie Whorton6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs GCC NAVYSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Sarah Younggren vs Becky Adams / Katrina Benes2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPatsy Botts / Tracy Sickels vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-19vs ATC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesLesley Baker / Sarah Younggren vs Molly DiCarlo - * / Jody Power2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatsy Botts / Sarah Mervak vs Barbara Fraser / Kim Bolt7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-12vs GNO GREENLost 02
L#2 DoublesCori Murphy / Tracy Sickels vs Meg Braun / Taylor Surroz1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLesley Baker / Sarah Mervak vs Jill Hibbeln / Lauren Hillary0-6, 3-6
2023-06-05vs CHCC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Sickels / Sarah Mervak vs Bevin Wallace / Kelly Stava1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Megan Whelan
published
3.26
Alison Wheeler
published 3.5
2.91
Lesley Baker
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.60
Sarah Mervak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Sarah Younggren
published
2.44
Tracy Sickels
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Kay Christensen
published
Rhonda Buder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Mervak + Lesley Baker5549% games+10.1% vs expected
Alison Wheeler + Megan Whelan14755% games+7.8% vs expected
Lesley Baker + Sarah Younggren2543% games−6.4% vs expected
Rhonda Buder + Kay Christensen224 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Buder + Sarah Mervak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Whelan
25W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Alison Wheeler
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3
Lesley Baker
87W–70L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Sarah Mervak
58W–115L career · 3 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
2.60
Sarah Younggren
15W–30L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Tracy Sickels
59W–95L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Kay Christensen
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rhonda Buder
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.