Teams

CHCC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-10vs ATC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesNanette Baumbusch / Holly Garnsey vs Molly DiCarlo / Jody Power0-6, 1-6
2023-06-26vs CACM BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesNanette Baumbusch / Pamela Trigg vs Merrell Aspin / Lesleigh Anderson6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAllison Stassen vs Camille Ford6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-19vs EM REDSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNanette Baumbusch vs Kristen Schiffner6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHolly Garnsey / Kirstin Simmons vs Rebecca Winslow / Meg Overstake4-6, 6-7
2023-06-12vs SKY REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Stava / Nanette Baumbusch vs Kate Dillon / Catherine Hodges6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllison Stassen / Angela Lercara vs Angie Sanders / Erika Sabatos3-6, 2-6
2023-06-05vs GAC PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamela Trigg / Holly Garnsey vs Kay Christensen / Patsy Botts4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Stassen vs Sarah Younggren3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Allison Stassen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Pamela Trigg
published
Angela Lercara
published 3
2.74
Kirstin Simmons
published
2.69
Nanette Baumbusch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.56
Allison Perkins
published 3
2.55
Lauren Ross
published
2.50
Holly Garnsey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bevin Wallace
published 2.5
Kelly Stava
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Lercara + Kirstin Simmons5356% games+2.9% vs expected
Holly Garnsey + Nanette Baumbusch10650% games−9.9% vs expected
Bevin Wallace + Holly Garnsey134 matchesnot enough data
Holly Garnsey + Kirstin Simmons134 matchesnot enough data
Holly Garnsey + Kelly Stava033 matchesnot enough data
Angela Lercara + Lauren Ross033 matchesnot enough data
Allison Perkins + Lauren Ross123 matchesnot enough data
Nanette Baumbusch + Allison Stassen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Stassen
54W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.17
Pamela Trigg
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Angela Lercara
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kirstin Simmons
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Nanette Baumbusch
58W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Allison Perkins
5W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Lauren Ross
3W–20L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.55
3
Holly Garnsey
50W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Bevin Wallace
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Stava
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.