Teams

Monte/Spittle/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-26vs Aguzzi/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesOlga Spittle / Claudia Paz vs Sirivanh Cey Chase-Aguzzi / Renee Adams6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAshwini Kashelikar / Ryoko Yamanobe vs Dana Baker / Linda Rizor6-4, 6-4
2025-04-19vs Givens/Mouser/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Cox / Ashwini Kashelikar vs Brittany Drescher / Ellen Gooden1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmelia Stephens / Stephanie Hill vs Melissa Goldberg / Kelly Clapp2-6, 4-6
2025-04-12vs Cramer/Brandon/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMegan McDugald / Claudia Paz vs Heather Brandon / Jenny Neeley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hill / Amelia Stephens vs Kaelin Cramer / Traci Gilbert-Stafford6-2, 6-3
2025-04-05vs Aguzzi/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshwini Kashelikar / Claudia Paz vs Cathy Radig / Dana Baker0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOlga Spittle / Jessie Seaman vs Lyudmila Topchiy / Sirivanh Cey Chase-Aguzzi6-4, 7-5
2025-03-29vs Givens/Mouser/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Paz / Olga Spittle vs Brandy Kennedy / Natalie Hennes2-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs Cramer/Brandon/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Cox / Megan McDugald vs Heather Brandon / Jenny Neeley6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hill / Amelia Stephens vs Megan de la O / Traci Gilbert-Stafford6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Megan McDugald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Claudia Paz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Lynn Blocher
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Stephanie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Jessie Seaman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Ashwini Kashelikar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Olga Spittle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Tiffany King
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Amelia Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.63
Lesa Monte
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Linda Staffen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Jennifer Mui
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Ryoko Yamanobe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Tracie McNeely
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amelia Stephens + Stephanie Hill3353% games+9.8% vs expected
Jessie Seaman + Olga Spittle2551% games+9.7% vs expected
Claudia Paz + Lynn Blocher8453% games+5.3% vs expected
Lesa Monte + Tiffany King5351% games+3.3% vs expected
Jessie Seaman + Lynn Blocher213 matchesnot enough data
Jessie Seaman + Tiffany King123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Staffen + Tiffany King033 matchesnot enough data
Olga Spittle + Claudia Paz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan McDugald
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Claudia Paz
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Lynn Blocher
32W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
Stephanie Hill
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jessie Seaman
21W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Ashwini Kashelikar
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Olga Spittle
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Tiffany King
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Amelia Stephens
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Lesa Monte
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Linda Staffen
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jennifer Mui
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Ryoko Yamanobe
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracie McNeely
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.