Teams

Chicks with Sticks

2024 SoCal Doubles 18&Over -- WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura - Women 3.0 WD

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-02vs Pierpont RacquettesLost 01
L#2 DoublesGizelda Parr / Jennifer Anderson vs Joeli Gutfleisch / Maria Finney1-6, 3-6
2024-11-15vs Double the FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Haywood / Gizelda Parr vs Emmy Tseng / Melissa Copeland3-6, 3-6
2024-10-25vs Las Posas Shot GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Beatriz Rivera vs Jean Salcido / Juliet Tamayo2-6, 2-6
2024-10-18vs Spanish HillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Juliette Ormberget vs Sandra Jou / Sarah Smith1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGizelda Parr / Young Kang vs Melissa Wallace / Tracy Mancuso1-6, 2-6
2024-10-11vs V-LLW NRCC Nice Aces-O'KeeffeLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathryn Pisaro / Juliette Ormberget vs Shannon Ellis / Chelsea Goldenberg4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBeatriz Rivera / Gizelda Parr vs Meredith Romero / Paulette Walker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Juliette Ormberget
published
2.89
Lisa Weiss
published
2.86
Nancy Leahy
published
2.78
Kathryn Pisaro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.77
Ellen Swagerty
published
2.68
Fran Krauss
published
2.68
Beatriz Rivera
published 3
2.52
Tes MacAraya
published
2.46
Gizelda Parr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Marilyn Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Pisaro + Gizelda Parr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juliette Ormberget
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Lisa Weiss
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
Nancy Leahy
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Kathryn Pisaro
74W–90L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.78
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Fran Krauss
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Beatriz Rivera
8W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Tes MacAraya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Gizelda Parr
44W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%60%40%
2.46
Marilyn Moore
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.