Teams

Willowfork - Slice Girls

2024 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Tuesday · 3.5 Ladies Doubles

19 players · average NTRP 3.32 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Hillary Kaessner
published 3.5
3.74
Stephanie Modaro
published
3.71
Christi Hamilton
published 4
3.53
Amelia Reddington
published 3.5
Elizabeth Allen
published 3.5
3.25
Pam Kelley
published
3.17
3.17
Debbie Corman
published 3.5
3.07
Cyndi Herold
published 3.5
2.76
Linda van Brunt
published
Betsy Gicquel
published 3
Danielle Pierce
published 3
2.70
2.61
KJ Barley
published
Kelley Wright
published
Kristy Smith
published
Mary Herold
published
Ruthie Courville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Modaro + Amelia Reddington6164% games+12.3% vs expected
Stephanie Modaro + Kristy Smith5160% games+7.1% vs expected
Stephanie Modaro + Christi Hamilton5259% games+6.5% vs expected
Pam Kelley + Debbie Corman6450% games+6.5% vs expected
Debbie Corman + Amelia Reddington5747% games−5.1% vs expected
Pam Kelley + Christi Hamilton3249% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Modaro + Debbie Corman314 matchesnot enough data
Pam Kelley + Stephanie Modaro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hillary Kaessner
27W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.79
Stephanie Modaro
113W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.74
4
Christi Hamilton
65W–50L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Amelia Reddington
61W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Elizabeth Allen
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pam Kelley
42W–33L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Andrea Shropshire
18W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.17
3.5
Debbie Corman
48W–57L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Cyndi Herold
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Linda van Brunt
2W–23L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
Betsy Gicquel
8W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Danielle Pierce
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Catherine Popovici
5W–19L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Ching Cushing-Murray
18W–36L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
KJ Barley
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelley Wright
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristy Smith
29W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Herold
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ruthie Courville
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.