Teams

5*CYu-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-12vs 1*KPollak-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Briana Oliver5-7, 0-6
W#3 SinglesHannah White vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-11vs 3*PostRust/McGill-DFCLost 01
L#1 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Amber Richardson2-6, 3-6
2024-06-20vs 1*KPollak-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesHillary Mulder vs Briana Oliver2-6, 4-6
2024-06-13vs 2*HRoss-EnoLost 03
L#1 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Sindhu Shivaji3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Maya Hahn0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHannah White vs Tiffany Langino1-6, 1-6
2024-06-06vs 3*PostRust/McGill-DFCLost 12
L#1 SinglesHillary Mulder vs Dayna Kelly4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Lacey Chylack6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesHannah White vs Mary Susan Easterling1-6, 2-6
2024-05-30vs 4*CCouto-HRWon 10
W#3 SinglesLaurie Straube vs Carrie Couto6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.77
Megan Chiles
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 4
3.66
Hillary Mulder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Abby Olmsted
published 3.5
3.54
Laurie Straube
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Hannah White
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Katie Masood
published
3.16
Anita Yang
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hillary Mulder + Hannah White123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Yu
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Megan Chiles
154W–47L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Hillary Mulder
46W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Abby Olmsted
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.62
3.5
Laurie Straube
169W–121L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Hannah White
87W–144L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Katie Masood
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Anita Yang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.