Teams

2*HRoss-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-31vs 5*CYu-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesValerie Acre vs Caroline Yu2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Katie Masood6-2, 6-0
2024-07-25vs 4*CCouto-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Beth Huebner6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesValerie Acre vs Mary Feger6-4, 6-2
2024-07-11vs 1*KPollak-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Betsy Shane6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Hannah Silverstein6-3, 6-1
2024-06-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesMaya Hahn vs Lacey Chylack6-2, 6-1
2024-06-20vs 4*CCouto-HRWon 21
W#1 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Carrie Couto6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLynsey Easley vs Julie Spearman6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Beth Huebner1-6, 4-6
2024-06-13vs 5*CYu-EnoWon 30
W#1 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Megan Chiles6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMaya Hahn vs Laurie Straube6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Hannah White6-1, 6-1
2024-06-06vs 1*KPollak-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesTiffany Langino vs Hannah Silverstein6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLynsey Easley vs Miho Ogura6-4, 6-2
2024-05-23vs 3*PostRust/McGill-DFCWon 30
W#1 SinglesSindhu Shivaji vs Amber Richardson7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesValerie Acre vs Susie Post-Rust6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJustyne Ross vs Laura Carlson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Valerie Acre
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.90
Sindhu Shivaji
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.85
Lynsey Easley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.83
Tiffany Langino
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.82
Maya Hahn
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.78
Justyne Ross
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.69
Meghan Howard
published
3.64
Heidi Ross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justyne Ross + Valerie Acre12353% games+1.0% vs expected
Heidi Ross + Lynsey Easley9356% games−0.1% vs expected
Maya Hahn + Valerie Acre314 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Ross + Tiffany Langino224 matchesnot enough data
Lynsey Easley + Justyne Ross404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Valerie Acre
129W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Sindhu Shivaji
73W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Lynsey Easley
131W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Tiffany Langino
244W–125L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Maya Hahn
61W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Justyne Ross
145W–117L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Heidi Ross
33W–25L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.