Teams

Wilson

2025 Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday · Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-27vs McQuillan - CF SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Alkinoe Meyer7-6, 1-3
L#2 SinglesMaryam Aranee vs Stephanie Kennedy2-6, 0-6
2025-10-21vs McQuillan - CF SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnne Belardo vs Judi Shoemaker7-6, 4-3
W#3 SinglesMaryam Aranee vs Sarah Midgley6-1, 6-4
2025-10-14vs McQuillan - CF SinglesLost 12
L#1 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Stephanie Kennedy2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLeslie Mandrgoc vs Judi Shoemaker4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAnne Belardo vs Sarah Midgley6-3, 5-5
2025-10-06vs McQuillan - CF SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Stephanie Kennedy6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMaryam Aranee vs Alkinoe Meyer6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAnne Belardo vs Ingrid Hunsicker3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-29vs McQuillan - CF SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesLeslie Mandrgoc vs Alkinoe Meyer0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAnne Belardo vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs McQuillan - CF SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Stephanie Kennedy3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLeslie Mandrgoc vs Judi Shoemaker2-6, 3-6
2025-09-15vs McQuillan - CF SinglesWon 20
W#2 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLeslie Mandrgoc vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-14vs McQuillan - CF SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Sarah Midgley6-4, 4-4
L#2 SinglesMaryam Aranee vs Alkinoe Meyer1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Yasmeen Sana Warsi
published
3.15
Peggah Wilson
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
3.12
Ursula Cox
published
3.05
Leslie Mandrgoc
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
3.05
Maryam Aranee
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
3.04
Anne Belardo
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggah Wilson + Anne Belardo4256% games+7.6% vs expected
Maryam Aranee + Anne Belardo7550% games+4.7% vs expected
Maryam Aranee + Peggah Wilson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yasmeen Sana Warsi
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3
Peggah Wilson
148W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Ursula Cox
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Leslie Mandrgoc
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Maryam Aranee
103W–91L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Anne Belardo
133W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.