Teams

McQuillan - CF Singles

2025 Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday · Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-27vs WilsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlkinoe Meyer vs Peggah Wilson6-7, 3-1
W#3 SinglesSarah Midgley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-21vs WilsonLost 03
L#1 SinglesAlkinoe Meyer vs Yasmeen Sana Warsi6-7, 3-4
L#2 SinglesJudi Shoemaker vs Anne Belardo6-7, 3-4
L#3 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Maryam Aranee1-6, 4-6
2025-10-14vs WilsonSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJudi Shoemaker vs Leslie Mandrgoc6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Anne Belardo3-6, 5-5
2025-10-06vs WilsonSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAlkinoe Meyer vs Maryam Aranee3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Anne Belardo6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-09-29vs WilsonWon 21
L#1 SinglesJudi Shoemaker vs Yasmeen Sana Warsi3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAlkinoe Meyer vs Leslie Mandrgoc6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Anne Belardo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-22vs WilsonWon 20
W#2 SinglesJudi Shoemaker vs Leslie Mandrgoc6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAlkinoe Meyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-15vs WilsonLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlkinoe Meyer vs Yasmeen Sana Warsi0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Peggah Wilson0-6, 2-6
2025-09-14vs WilsonWon 21
L#1 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Peggah Wilson4-6, 4-4
W#2 SinglesAlkinoe Meyer vs Maryam Aranee6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Kendra McQuillan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Alkinoe Meyer
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.18
Stephanie Kennedy
published
2.89
Judi Shoemaker
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.85
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.59
Sarah Midgley
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Midgley + Ingrid Hunsicker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kendra McQuillan
165W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Alkinoe Meyer
134W–96L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Stephanie Kennedy
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Judi Shoemaker
112W–135L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
113W–175L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Sarah Midgley
33W–64L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.