Teams

PWilliams NHC55

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesAllen McMillen / Greg Byrd vs Jack Kikta / David Jerose6-4, 6-0
2022-05-03vs DSwannSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStewart Marlowe / John Perry vs Robert Chandler / Vincent Conzola7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRoss Gordon / David Hodl vs Charles Brignac / James Worley3-6, 2-6
2022-04-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Byrd / John Perry vs David Shuman / Thomas Strande6-2, 6-0
2022-04-12vs JParhamLost 02
L#2 DoublesAllen McMillen / Scott Abee vs Ken Dehaven / John Richardson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Marlowe / David Hodl vs John Parham / Michael Klein0-6, 2-6
2022-04-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Perry / Stewart Marlowe vs Richard Rubin / Paul Schroeder6-0, 6-4
2022-03-29vs JCockerhamWon 21
W#1 DoublesStewart Marlowe / John Perry vs Elden LeGaux / Philip Robertson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDane Huffman / David Hodl vs Ken Haney / Michael Hughes6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesReginald B Gillespie Jr / Allen McMillen vs GEORGE ELLISON / Rick Smith6-3, 6-4
2022-03-22vs MGentry 55+ 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Abee / Allen McMillen vs Kevin Manweiler / Tim Pflaum6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStewart Marlowe / John Perry vs Mark Gentry / Thomas Nuxoll6-2, 6-2
2022-03-15vs IMKocurekSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStewart Marlowe / John Perry vs Chris Henrion / Marty Kocurek4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDane Huffman / David Hodl vs Charles Ashby / John Cleary6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
3.19
David Hodl
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Peter Williams
published
3.15
John Perry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Dane Huffman
published 3.5
3.01
Allen McMillen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Ross Gordon
published
Scott Abee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Hodl + John Perry6653% games−3.9% vs expected
Allen McMillen + John Perry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reginald B Gillespie Jr
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
David Hodl
47W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Peter Williams
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
John Perry
69W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dane Huffman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Allen McMillen
47W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Ross Gordon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Abee
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.