Teams

DSwann

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-10vs JCockerhamWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Chandler / Vincent Conzola vs Rick Smith / Ken Haney6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / James Worley vs Michael Hughes / Philip Robertson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-03vs PWilliams NHC55Split 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Chandler / Vincent Conzola vs Stewart Marlowe / John Perry6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / James Worley vs Ross Gordon / David Hodl6-3, 6-2
2022-04-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / Larry Wenger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-12vs MGentry 55+ 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / James Worley vs Kevin Manweiler / Alan McInnes5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / ROEHL SANTOS vs Robert Mitchell / Thomas Nuxoll6-3, 6-1
2022-03-29vs WTurner/Evans 55Split 11
L#2 DoublesCharles Brignac / Joel Broadway vs John Flagg / William Turner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVincent Conzola / John Rabby vs Jay Copan / Mark Unruh6-1, 6-0
2022-03-22vs JParhamWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Brignac / ROEHL SANTOS vs Randall Harrill / Jay Blanchfield6-0, 6-1
2022-03-15vs RRubin/LeeWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Chandler / Vincent Conzola vs Lance Jansen / Richard Rubin6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
David Swann
published 3.5
3.38
Vincent Conzola
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
James Worley
published 3.5
3.33
Greg Cox
published 3.5
3.21
Larry Wenger
published
3.16
Charles Brignac
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
David Lee
published 3.5
3.09
ROEHL SANTOS
published
3.04
Joel Broadway
published
John Rabby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Swann + Larry Wenger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Swann
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Vincent Conzola
205W–133L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
James Worley
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Greg Cox
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Larry Wenger
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Charles Brignac
125W–136L career · 6 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
David Lee
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
ROEHL SANTOS
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Joel Broadway
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
John Rabby
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.