Teams

Fling: Double Trouble 40+ ES23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 MEN

11 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-14vs Tuplano: TBC 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCory Zupfer / Rob Stahley vs Gene Scow / Keith Swift6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-12-07vs Jossi/Tennis 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichael Streater vs Olivier Haise3-6, 2-6
2022-11-16vs Hessing/Pupp 40+ ES23Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael Streater vs Luiz Pacheco1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRob Stahley / Matthew Fling vs Mark Witmer / CRAIG STERN2-6, 2-6
2022-11-02Won 20
W#2 SinglesMichael Streater vs Matthew Kremer6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTaras Karkoc / Rob Stahley vs Jon Springsted / Arlie Fundaun6-4, 6-1
2022-10-12vs Hassenstab: Fed Express 40+ ES23Split 11
L#2 DoublesMichael Streater / Cory Zupfer vs Scott Weiland / William Kolstad3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Fling / Rob Stahley vs John Drysdale / Peter Krause5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-05vs Edwardson/Chase 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMichael Streater vs Steven Swanberg5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Sae Yoon
published
3.46
Tom Larson
published
3.42
Michael Streater
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.27
Jim Sandor
published
3.17
Taras Karkoc
published
3.15
Stefan Lucyk
published
3.15
Rob Stahley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
John Smetana
published
2.79
Matthew Fling
published
Don Bauer
published
Joseph Marnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Streater + Tom Larson6164% games+7.3% vs expected
Matthew Fling + John Smetana0623% games−6.8% vs expected
Stefan Lucyk + Taras Karkoc314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sae Yoon
40W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Tom Larson
25W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michael Streater
158W–101L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jim Sandor
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Taras Karkoc
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Stefan Lucyk
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Rob Stahley
17W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.15
John Smetana
1W–35L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.80
Matthew Fling
6W–51L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.79
Don Bauer
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Marnell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.