Teams

Edwardson/Chase 40+ ES23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-16vs Jossi/Tennis 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNate Gilman / Daniel Edwardson vs Chuck Tatsuda / Luis Laguna5-7, 3-6
2022-11-02vs Hessing/Pupp 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Mashaal / Daniel Edwardson vs Robert Thiegs / Dennis Lohmann4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-12vs Alschlager/Crofut 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Schoenecker / Daniel Edwardson vs Scott Krohn / Quang Nystrom7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-05vs Fling: Double Trouble 40+ ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesPhillip Chase / Daniel Edwardson vs Tom Larson / Sae Yoon6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Phillip Chase
published 4.5
3.81
Paul Schoenecker
published
David Kilpatrick
published 4
3.67
Steven Swanberg
published
3.39
Daniel Edwardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Matthew Ruble
published
3.30
Jeff Craig
published
3.27
Jim Schwier
published
3.23
Oscar Oboza
published
3.16
Lawrence Wong
published
3.01
Timothy Cruz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Phillip Chase
112W–51L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
Paul Schoenecker
44W–34L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
David Kilpatrick
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Swanberg
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Daniel Edwardson
99W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Matthew Ruble
42W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jeff Craig
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
Jim Schwier
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Oscar Oboza
25W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Lawrence Wong
21W–20L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Timothy Cruz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Rajan Balasubramanian
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.