Teams

McKinney/Lane W8.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT W Monday · W8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-03vs Greenhill/Perron-Hassemer W8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Farrell / Katheryn Ross vs Diana Carr / Rita Hudson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTheresa Lane / Michelle McGuire vs Kristen Aragon / Sue Lopez de Correia2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Huffman / Jacqueline Jenkins vs Karin Fisher / Jamie McCrary3-6, 3-6
2025-01-27vs Stonebriar/Jordan-Mason W8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Farrell / Katheryn Ross vs Lauren Cain / Terri Wallace6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle McGuire / Suzanne Kim vs Connie Ewing / Julie Dickson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Glastad / Staci Frost vs Erin Carlson / Happy Mason6-3, 6-1
2025-01-20vs Brookhaven/Murphy W8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesKatheryn Ross / Amy Farrell vs Kathy Engelbrecht / Teri Ware2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Lane / Michelle McGuire vs Amy Dungan / Renee Haygood2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDoreen Thomas / Shannon Craig vs Linda Bowers / Suzette Fenton2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Michele Beach
published
3.83
Katheryn Ross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Karen Huffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Allison Glastad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Caryn Dula
published 4
3.65
Michelle McGuire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Shannon Craig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Doreen Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Staci Frost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Suzanne Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Alysen Northern
published 3.5
3.17
Emily Chapman
published
Jacqueline Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Purdy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Beach
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Katheryn Ross
18W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Karen Huffman
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Allison Glastad
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Caryn Dula
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle McGuire
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Shannon Craig
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Doreen Thomas
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Staci Frost
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Suzanne Kim
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Alysen Northern
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Emily Chapman
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.17
Jacqueline Jenkins
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sally Purdy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.