← Search

Karen Huffman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
260 matches · 168W–92L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history260 matches
W
2026-10-22 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cathy Maler
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-19 · LWR Sosa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Tosti
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-10-15 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hillary Nielsen
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-18 · Team 10 Gleneagles/Wright-Shukis W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Wright
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kim Reiser
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nanelle Rosales championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nanelle Rosales championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nanelle Rosales championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nanelle Rosales championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cathy Maler
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Wright W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Konstans
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-18 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Wright W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cami Gorsky
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
40%
4W–6L · 49.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.7%
81W–32L · 58.4% of games
4.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 32.1% of games
7.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 66.8% of games
8.0
69.4%
25W–11L · 58% of games
8.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.4% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 65.1% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
146 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
29 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova