Teams

TVTC Prince

2025 OH OV SPRING · SUMMER Tri Level

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-29vs YMCA MaceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJoseph Sinclair / Joshua Lawson vs Summer Cook / Jeffery MacE6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRICK PRINCE / Ryan Hunt vs H Jason Hall / Kevin Ellison3-6, 4-6
2025-06-11vs TIC ElliotSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSamuel Bowman / Jaymes Haggerty vs James Mcintosh / Ryon Zent2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Delcotto / Joshua Lawson vs Matthew Sutton / Tanner Whipkey6-2, 6-4
2025-06-04vs YMCA MaceWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaymes Haggerty / Rico Williams vs Michael Kawash / Mychal Schulz6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Sinclair / Jay Cooke vs Ethan Shepard / Caleb Starkey7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrew Barr / Ryan Hunt vs Kevin Ellison / H Jason Hall5-7, 0-6
2025-05-18vs TIC ElliotWon 21
L#1 DoublesJason Prince / Rico Williams vs Ryan Mullins / Ryon Zent6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJay Cooke / Brian Delcotto vs Jeffrey Goins / Matthew Sutton6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRICK PRINCE / Whitney Hess vs Brennan Bish / Otmer Elmore6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SUMMER Tri Level
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TVTC Prince31751091
2TIC Elliot31751197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Jaymes Haggerty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Brian Delcotto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.38
Whitney Hess
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Barr
published 3.5
3.21
RICK PRINCE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Prince
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jay Cooke
published
Joseph Sinclair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joshua Lawson
published
Rico Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Hess + RICK PRINCE10555% games−2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaymes Haggerty
15W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.05
4.5
Brian Delcotto
33W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.85
Whitney Hess
64W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Andrew Barr
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
RICK PRINCE
42W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Jason Prince
23W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jay Cooke
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Sinclair
15W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joshua Lawson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rico Williams
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Hunt
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Bowman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.