Teams

YMCA Mace

2025 OH OV SPRING · SUMMER Tri Level

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-29vs TVTC PrinceWon 10
W#3 DoublesH Jason Hall / Kevin Ellison vs RICK PRINCE / Ryan Hunt6-3, 6-4
2025-06-27vs TIC ElliotSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEthan Shepard / Caleb Starkey vs Tanner Whipkey / Matthew Sutton7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSummer Cook / H Jason Hall vs Andrew Elliot / Otmer Elmore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-04vs TVTC PrinceLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Kawash / Mychal Schulz vs Jaymes Haggerty / Rico Williams0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEthan Shepard / Caleb Starkey vs Joseph Sinclair / Jay Cooke6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Ellison / H Jason Hall vs Andrew Barr / Ryan Hunt7-5, 6-0
2025-05-30vs TIC ElliotLost 02
L#1 DoublesEthan Shepard / Michael Kawash vs Ryan Mullins / James Mcintosh1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMychal Schulz / Sam Willson vs Tanner Whipkey / Joseph Nassif0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SUMMER Tri Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Caleb Starkey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Michael Kawash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Jeffery MacE
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ethan Shepard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
H Jason Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Ellison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mychal Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sam Willson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Summer Cook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Ellison + H Jason Hall5850% games+0.5% vs expected
Summer Cook + Jeffery MacE4937% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caleb Starkey
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Michael Kawash
20W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Jeffery MacE
67W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Ethan Shepard
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
H Jason Hall
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Ellison
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mychal Schulz
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Willson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Summer Cook
8W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.