Teams

305igthers at Crandon Park

2026 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.5 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.40 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-15vs Miami/Radillo/18&over4.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Deering / Elisa Poli vs Bianca Alvarez / Miriam Radillo6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIsabella Ronchi / Helene Buechele vs Estefania Lacoa / Sanja Zivanovic6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRommy Chang / Elizabeth Marchante Castillo vs Carin Blanchard / Janine Burke6-3, 6-4
2025-11-09vs Miami/Radillo/18&over4.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Wendy Sosa vs Marcela Schwartz / Maria Hulett6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Siegler vs Barbara Viscito2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesIsabella Ratti vs Gricel Boto Bernales6-7, 4-6
2025-11-08vs Valls (NMB)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Sosa / Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero vs Joann Romney / Madeline Wilburn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-01vs Miami/Forman/18&over4.5WLost 12
L#2 DoublesWendy Sosa / Lorelei Garrett vs Jill Reiter / Laura Herskowitz3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesIsabella Ratti vs Britta Reinhardt Moser6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Maria Ayarra vs Giuditta Castello / Jill Hidalgo4-6, 3-6
2025-10-18vs Valls (NMB)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Rommy Chang vs Katherine Kelly / Elena DeVera3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesIsabella Ratti vs Susie Valls6-1, 6-2
2025-10-11vs Miami/Forman/18&over4.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesSandra Deering / Lorelei Garrett vs Laura Herskowitz / Helena Maseda3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Siegler vs Britta Reinhardt Moser4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHelene Buechele / Lesley Hernandez vs Adriana Umana / Daniela Rengifo1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesIsabella Ratti vs CAROLINA CAMPUZANO6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Isabella Ronchi vs Giuditta Castello / Jill Hidalgo2-6, 3-6
2025-10-04vs Miami/Radillo/18&over4.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandra Deering / Elisa Poli vs Gricel Boto Bernales / Maria Mustelier6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesIsabella Ratti / Wendy Sosa vs Sanja Zivanovic / Ivet Hernandez3-6, 2-6
2025-09-27vs Valls (NMB)Won 32
L#1 DoublesYulia Skurikhina / Neda Pacifico vs Laurie Mathews / RENEE ALEXIS6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Marchante Castillo vs Katherine Kelly1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Deering / Elisa Poli vs Joann Romney / Courtney Blatt5-4
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Siegler vs Tamara Varela Vega6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero / Helene Buechele vs Susie Valls / Angela Jimenez6-1, 7-5
2025-09-20vs Miami/Forman/18&over4.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Deering / Elisa Poli vs Laura Herskowitz / Jill Reiter4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRommy Chang / Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero vs Magdalena Brave / BELEN DODERO1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Sosa / Isabella Ratti vs Garvine Recalde / Helena Maseda2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miami/Forman/18&over4.5W81341126301
2Miami/Radillo/18&over4.5W54252045361
3305igthers at Crandon Park36182755406
4Valls (NMB)27133269454

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Elisa Poli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.21
Leocadie Ahmes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Sandra Deering
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
4.19
Claudia Wilkins
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Lorelei Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.18
Laurie Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.13
Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.04
Rommy Chang
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.04
Isabella Ratti
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Helene Buechele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Suzanne Siegler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.90
Maria Ayarra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Isabella Ronchi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Lesley Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.75
Wendy Sosa
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Marchante Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Neda Pacifico
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Yulia Skurikhina
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Deering + Elisa Poli6258% games+8.9% vs expected
Lesley Hernandez + Sandra Deering8160% games+6.8% vs expected
Wendy Sosa + Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero4848% games+1.1% vs expected
Rommy Chang + Isabella Ronchi5848% games−2.3% vs expected
Rommy Chang + Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero1541% games−11.2% vs expected
Rommy Chang + Leocadie Ahmes2344% gamesnot enough data
Rommy Chang + Maria Ayarra314 matchesnot enough data
Leocadie Ahmes + Sandra Deering134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elisa Poli
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Leocadie Ahmes
47W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Sandra Deering
29W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Claudia Wilkins
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Lorelei Garrett
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Laurie Weinstein
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero
8W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Rommy Chang
119W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
Isabella Ratti
16W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
Helene Buechele
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Suzanne Siegler
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.93
Maria Ayarra
55W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Isabella Ronchi
94W–95L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.89
Lesley Hernandez
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Wendy Sosa
16W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Elizabeth Marchante Castillo
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Neda Pacifico
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yulia Skurikhina
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.