Teams

Miami/Radillo/18&over4.5W

2026 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.5 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-14vs Valls (NMB)Won 10
W#1 SinglesGianna Francis vs Susie Valls6-0, 6-1
2025-10-14vs Valls (NMB)Won 10
W#1 DoublesIvet Hernandez / Julieta Elena Leon MacHado vs RENEE ALEXIS / Sherril Colombo6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-27vs Miami/Forman/18&over4.5WLost 01
L#1 SinglesGianna Francis vs Brooke Oransky5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miami/Forman/18&over4.5W81341126301
2Miami/Radillo/18&over4.5W54252045361
3305igthers at Crandon Park36182755406
4Valls (NMB)27133269454

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Ivet Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Michele Drucker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Janine Burke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Gianna Francis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
NATALI SPILBERG
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Barbara Viscito
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
Sanja Zivanovic
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Bianca Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.15
Estefania Lacoa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Julieta Elena Leon MacHado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Carin Blanchard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Maria Mustelier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.09
Gricel Boto Bernales
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.09
Steffi Kordy
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Maria Hulett
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.98
Marcela Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Miriam Radillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Nicole Cinquino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carin Blanchard + Michele Drucker6263% games+14.6% vs expected
Gricel Boto Bernales + Bianca Alvarez5554% games+12.2% vs expected
Estefania Lacoa + NATALI SPILBERG8557% games+8.5% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Janine Burke71052% games+5.9% vs expected
Bianca Alvarez + Michele Drucker4452% games+4.7% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Maria Hulett684456% games+1.4% vs expected
Barbara Viscito + Michele Drucker3355% games+1.0% vs expected
Barbara Viscito + Estefania Lacoa4155% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ivet Hernandez
141W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Michele Drucker
94W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.38
4.5
Janine Burke
266W–184L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Gianna Francis
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
NATALI SPILBERG
59W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Barbara Viscito
105W–116L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Sanja Zivanovic
74W–70L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Bianca Alvarez
181W–133L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Estefania Lacoa
239W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
Julieta Elena Leon MacHado
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Carin Blanchard
207W–149L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
Maria Mustelier
47W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Gricel Boto Bernales
343W–260L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.09
Steffi Kordy
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Maria Hulett
182W–138L career · 7 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Marcela Schwartz
39W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Miriam Radillo
87W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
Nicole Cinquino
35W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.