Teams

Throm, Bridget

2026 HOA Adult Mid Tri-Level 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 · Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level

18 players · average NTRP 3.92 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs Chiao, DeniseLost 03
L#1 DoublesTrina Kahl / Cynthia Kuhlman vs Denise Chiao / Lara Anderson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Chisholm / Sharon Schlehuber vs Shelley O'Brien / Amber Heineman4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Seaton / Carolyn Lopker vs Madelyn Beasley / Lori Blinn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-19vs Edwards, AliceWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stolte / Trina Kahl vs Maddie Abel / Shannon Finn1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Carpenter / Sharon Schlehuber vs Emily Skrobacz / Susan Bernstein6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShannon Margherio / Jillian Lapping vs Alice Edwards / Amy Kentfield6-2, 6-1
2026-08-12vs Andrew, MariaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Hartman / Jennifer VanMeter vs Sara Maguire / Rhonda Bonner1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Carpenter / Lara Maple vs Kelsey Corken / Cara Lonergan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Margherio / Christin Mann vs Sarah Baldelomar / Tracy Farnsworth6-4, 6-4
2026-08-05vs Hill, JenniferLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Thomley Marsh / Kate Hartman vs Jennifer Hill / Allison Salmon2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBridget Throm / Tiffany Hellen vs Ellen Griffin / Allyson Braun6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Seaton / Jillian Lapping vs Trisha Jolliffe / Connie Hucker0-6, 3-6
2026-07-22vs Vaughn, OlaWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer VanMeter / Kate Hartman vs Michelle Terriquez / Jill Burgdorfer3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBridget Throm / Sharon Schlehuber vs Ola Vaughn / Blerina Boci6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEmily Seaton / Jillian Lapping vs Terah Buresh / Shaina Billington6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Vaughn, Ola31938101
2Throm, Bridget12451184
3Hill, Jennifer12361183
4Chiao, Denise12271488
5Andrew, Maria134818120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Cynthia Kuhlman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Jennifer VanMeter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Amanda Thomley Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
Kate Hartman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Trina Kahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Bridget Throm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Sharon Schlehuber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Tiffany Hellen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Jennifer Stolte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Laura Chisholm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Lara Maple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Christin Mann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Shannon Margherio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jillian Lapping
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Carolyn Lopker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Emily Seaton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Allison Hughes
published 3.5
Jennifer Carpenter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Hellen + Laura Chisholm16462% games+8.8% vs expected
Allison Hughes + Emily Seaton3357% games+8.6% vs expected
Shannon Margherio + Christin Mann4259% games+4.8% vs expected
Emily Seaton + Jillian Lapping8354% games+2.2% vs expected
Jennifer Stolte + Cynthia Kuhlman3450% games+2.1% vs expected
Carolyn Lopker + Jillian Lapping6357% games−0.4% vs expected
Cynthia Kuhlman + Kate Hartman61246% games−1.6% vs expected
Allison Hughes + Shannon Margherio2544% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cynthia Kuhlman
75W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
Jennifer VanMeter
133W–108L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
4.5
Amanda Thomley Marsh
21W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.82
Kate Hartman
35W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.78
Trina Kahl
53W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Bridget Throm
77W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Sharon Schlehuber
81W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Tiffany Hellen
79W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
Jennifer Stolte
69W–90L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.60
Laura Chisholm
93W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Lara Maple
109W–84L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Christin Mann
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Shannon Margherio
29W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Jillian Lapping
30W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Carolyn Lopker
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Emily Seaton
40W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Allison Hughes
24W–41L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Carpenter
42W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.