Teams

Edwards, Alice

2026 HOA Adult Mid Tri-Level 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 · Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs Hill, JenniferLost 12
L#1 DoublesDina Mitchell / Shannon Finn vs Jennifer Hill / Allison Salmon1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlysen Abel / Phoebe Davenport vs Ellen Griffin / Rebecca Snodgrass0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBetsy Norberg / Courtney Kathrens vs Megan Schemmel / Norma Canas6-1, 6-3
2026-08-19vs Throm, BridgetLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaddie Abel / Shannon Finn vs Jennifer Stolte / Trina Kahl6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEmily Skrobacz / Susan Bernstein vs Jennifer Carpenter / Sharon Schlehuber1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Edwards / Amy Kentfield vs Shannon Margherio / Jillian Lapping2-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs Vaughn, OlaLost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Hambrick / Maddie Abel vs Michelle Terriquez / Jill Burgdorfer3-6, 3-5
L#2 DoublesLaura Dicus / Emily Skrobacz vs Christina Porto / Katy Gondring5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElle Lemons / Amy Kentfield vs Erin Duba / Amy Jenkins3-6, 3-5
2026-08-05vs Fendler, KathleenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Stahl / Dina Mitchell vs Mallory Plungkhen / Thresa Lampe2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlysen Abel / Rebecca Floray vs Margaux Blackwell / Kathleen Fendler3-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesElle Lemons / Kristin Heurtin vs Mary Brauer / Kaitlin Holt6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-29vs Chiao, DeniseWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaddie Abel / Shannon Finn vs Lara Anderson / Kayla Ruelle7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Floray / Patty Garvey vs Vanessa Connell / Shelley O'Brien6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristin Heurtin / Betsy Norberg vs Shauntae Morris / Eileen Hotze6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jackie Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Erin Hambrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Maddie Abel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Dina Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Patty Garvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Alysen Abel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Laura Dicus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Rebecca Floray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Shannon Finn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Betsy Norberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Elle Lemons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Emily Skrobacz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Kristin Heurtin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Phoebe Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Alice Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Amy Kentfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Courtney Kathrens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Bernstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dina Mitchell + Jackie Stahl2348% games+8.3% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Alice Edwards8352% games+7.2% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Jackie Stahl4546% games+6.6% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Phoebe Davenport3344% games+3.6% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Alysen Abel1545% games−0.5% vs expected
Laura Dicus + Emily Skrobacz4546% games−0.8% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Dina Mitchell224 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Heurtin + Patty Garvey044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Stahl
130W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.03
Erin Hambrick
130W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.99
Maddie Abel
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.93
Dina Mitchell
154W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.76
Patty Garvey
48W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Alysen Abel
148W–117L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Laura Dicus
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Rebecca Floray
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Shannon Finn
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Betsy Norberg
145W–131L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Elle Lemons
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Emily Skrobacz
35W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Kristin Heurtin
118W–136L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Phoebe Davenport
74W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Alice Edwards
136W–101L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Amy Kentfield
88W–80L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Courtney Kathrens
32W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Susan Bernstein
16W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.