Teams

Sets Addicts

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 3.77 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-09-17vs Mix It UpLost 01
L#3 DoublesCari Massie / David Massie vs Amanda Steele / Brian Kittelson4-6, 2-6
2021-09-15vs Beer PressureWon 20
W#2 DoublesEric Boyington / Christy Siemons vs Jake Putnam / Merritt Swartley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Massie / Cari Massie vs Thomas Angstman / Ginger Cummins6-3, 6-3
2021-09-13vs Lovin' Every DayLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnya Sandusky / Ray Cochrane vs Ashley Tribble / Jeff Huhn7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-12vs ETC HittersLost 01
L#2 DoublesCari Massie / David Massie vs Katherine Johnson / Bill Johnson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-08-30vs Guys & Dolls w/BallsWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristy Siemons / Eric Boyington vs Zel Mertz / Jack Cook6-2, 6-4
2021-08-27vs Bring the Heat!Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCari Massie / David Massie vs Derrick O'Neill / Patty O'Neill6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRaymond Verveckken / Christy Siemons vs Cory Sparks / Karie Pappani5-7, 4-6
2021-08-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnya Sandusky / Ray Cochrane vs Trever Browne / Robyn Roby0-6, 5-7
2021-08-23vs Have FunLost 02
L#2 DoublesRay Cochrane / Jennifer Sukow vs Kevin Hoffman / Clarissa Cutler-Evans6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Massie / Cari Massie vs Chandra Angadi / Jamie Cilley3-6, 3-6
2021-08-18vs TennisiousWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnya Sandusky / Ray Cochrane vs Teresa McDonald / Clay Space6-0, 6-2
2021-08-13vs Mixed Love/7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnya Sandusky / Fazal Shariff vs Courtney Hobbs / Alan Hines3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnya Sandusky / Ray Cochrane vs Maria Turner / Fritz Durham6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-08-09vs UntouchaballsLost 01
L#2 DoublesRay Cochrane / Christy Siemons vs Tayler Henrie / Daniela Hefner4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Full Metal Racquets12233926299
2Mixed Love/7.5104281434338
3Have Fun104271538363
4Untouchaballs95251738339
5Tennisious95241841350
6Sets Addicts95241844386
7Swingblades86212149388
8Guys & Dolls w/Balls68192350391
9Lovin' Every Day68162658444
10Mixology59182454394
11Mix It Up410162657422
12Bring the Heat!410142864461
13Beer Pressure212113165438

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Anya Sandusky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.92
Fazal Shariff
published 4
3.91
3.82
Timothy Brown
published 4
Amy Mikkelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Eric Boyington
published 4
3.58
Dorsey Wanless
published 4
3.46
Margie Waddel
published 3.5
3.38
Jennifer Sukow
published 3.5
3.30
Nancy Mallory
published 3.5
3.27
David Massie
published 3.5
Cari Massie
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Christy Siemons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ray Cochrane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Travis Hopkey
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Mikkelson + Raymond Verveckken6068% games+8.6% vs expected
Margie Waddel + David Massie3350% games+6.7% vs expected
Cari Massie + David Massie283247% games−1.4% vs expected
Amy Mikkelson + Timothy Brown5751% games−1.5% vs expected
Travis Hopkey + Dorsey Wanless8657% gamesnot enough data
Travis Hopkey + Christy Siemons3356% gamesnot enough data
Fazal Shariff + Amy Mikkelson6066% gamesnot enough data
Christy Siemons + Eric Boyington4250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anya Sandusky
211W–108L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%23%77%
4.09
4
Fazal Shariff
162W–72L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Raymond Verveckken
63W–45L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Timothy Brown
180W–124L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Amy Mikkelson
102W–91L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Eric Boyington
65W–87L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Dorsey Wanless
122W–94L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Margie Waddel
110W–127L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Jennifer Sukow
144W–145L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Nancy Mallory
189W–137L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
David Massie
90W–119L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cari Massie
46W–96L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Christy Siemons
78W–79L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Ray Cochrane
90W–136L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Travis Hopkey
95W–75L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.