Teams

Beer Pressure

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-09-18vs Have FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Brown / Kristy Wong vs Kevin Hoffman / Clarissa Cutler-Evans3-6, 1-6
2021-09-13vs ETC HittersLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenae Rainwater / Scott Pugrud vs Katherine Johnson / Bill Johnson2-6, 4-6
2021-09-08vs Guys & Dolls w/BallsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Lundstedt / Renae Rainwater vs Adair Holden / David Scott2-6, 2-6
2021-08-29vs Lovin' Every DayWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristy Wong / Stephen Brown vs Kimberly Shansby / Mark Powell7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-08-26vs TennisiousLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenae Rainwater / Thomas Angstman vs Noe Lopez / Leslie Hughes3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-08-18vs MixologySplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Pugrud / Renae Rainwater vs Maria Turner / Fritz Durham7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJake Putnam / Kristy Wong vs Andrea Baerwald / Rick Stoddard6-3, 6-3
2021-08-16vs UntouchaballsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Wear / Chad Anderson vs Spencer Woods / Colleen Schoeck2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Wear / Merritt Swartley vs Alex Henrie / Jillian Martin1-6, 0-6
2021-08-11vs Mix It UpLost 02
L#2 DoublesJames Wear / Kristy Wong vs Steven Buchanan / Angie O'Hara2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Wear / Scott Pugrud vs Willie Lafrades / Dawn Lafrades5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2021-08-09vs SwingbladesLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenae Rainwater / Thomas Angstman vs Michael Simpson / Jenny Tobin3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Full Metal Racquets12233926299
2Mixed Love/7.5104281434338
3Have Fun104271538363
4Untouchaballs95251738339
5Tennisious95241841350
6Sets Addicts95241844386
7Swingblades86212149388
8Guys & Dolls w/Balls68192350391
9Lovin' Every Day68162658444
10Mixology59182454394
11Mix It Up410162657422
12Bring the Heat!410142864461
13Beer Pressure212113165438

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Emily Flores
published 4
Chad Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.45
Jake Putnam
published 3.5
3.43
Jane Perlaky
published 3.5
3.24
Michael Lundstedt
published 3.5
3.13
Merritt Swartley
published 3.5
3.12
Thomas Angstman
published
2.78
Ginger Cummins
published 3
James Wear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
ADRA KIPPER
published 3
2.64
Jill Yost
published
Kristy Wong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Wear
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Renae Rainwater
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Scott Pugrud
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Flores + Michael Lundstedt5750% games+3.8% vs expected
Ginger Cummins + Michael Lundstedt2842% games−4.0% vs expected
Emily Flores + Chad Anderson11657% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Angstman + Emily Flores9547% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Angstman + Renae Rainwater2648% gamesnot enough data
Jake Putnam + Ginger Cummins3542% gamesnot enough data
Emily Flores + Scott Pugrud6069% gamesnot enough data
ADRA KIPPER + Scott Pugrud4243% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Flores
157W–100L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Chad Anderson
82W–44L career · 15 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Jake Putnam
44W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Jane Perlaky
146W–185L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Michael Lundstedt
80W–108L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Merritt Swartley
30W–56L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
Thomas Angstman
15W–43L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Ginger Cummins
64W–118L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
3
James Wear
4W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
ADRA KIPPER
45W–103L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Jill Yost
52W–129L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.64
Kristy Wong
22W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Wear
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Renae Rainwater
19W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Pugrud
16W–15L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.