Teams

BASALT BLACK

2025 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 2.5 - MOUNTAINS

11 players · average NTRP 2.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-28vs GSCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Ralston / Dena Albright vs Grace Wright / Julie Kaufman4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNancy Garrigus vs Erin Evers5-7, 1-6
2025-07-21vs GSCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Garrigus / Angela Rooding vs Erin Evers / Grace Wright6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Fitzgerald vs Julie Kaufman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDena Albright / Desiree Pimentel vs Molly Hamilton / Heidi McCullough3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-14vs GSCC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Ralston / Ginger Opp vs Julie Kaufman / Erin Evers0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Mirich vs Katherine Proctor6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Rooding / Nancy Garrigus vs Molly Hamilton / Rachael Degraffenried6-3, 6-3
2025-07-07vs GSCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDena Albright / Katie Ralston vs Julie Kaufman / Kate Dehm3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJessie Hjorth vs Kristin Davis6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Allen / Nancy Garrigus vs Molly Hamilton / Rachael Degraffenried7-5, 6-3
2025-06-30vs GSCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Mirich / Ginger Opp vs Grace Wright / Katherine Proctor7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAimee Mossa vs Kristin Davis1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Garrigus / Angela Rooding vs Heidi McCullough / Rachael Degraffenried6-1, 6-2
2025-06-23vs GSCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDena Albright / Lauren Mirich vs Kristin Davis / Grace Wright4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNancy Garrigus vs Erin Evers2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessie Hjorth / Ginger Opp vs Molly Hamilton / Julie Kaufman5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Katie Fitzgerald
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Lauren Mirich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Nancy Garrigus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Angela Rooding
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Ginger Opp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Aimee Mossa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Audrey Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Desiree Pimentel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Dena Albright
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jessie Hjorth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Katie Ralston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Garrigus + Lauren Mirich7259% games+12.9% vs expected
Lauren Mirich + Jessie Hjorth4649% games−0.6% vs expected
Dena Albright + Nancy Garrigus314 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Mossa + Audrey Allen314 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Allen + Desiree Pimentel134 matchesnot enough data
Dena Albright + Lauren Mirich123 matchesnot enough data
Dena Albright + Jessie Hjorth033 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Garrigus + Angela Rooding303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Fitzgerald
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Lauren Mirich
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%28%72%
2.58
Nancy Garrigus
30W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44
3
Angela Rooding
3W–6L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Ginger Opp
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Aimee Mossa
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Audrey Allen
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Desiree Pimentel
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Dena Albright
15W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jessie Hjorth
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Ralston
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.