Teams

GSCC RED

2025 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 2.5 - MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-28vs BASALT BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesGrace Wright / Julie Kaufman vs Katie Ralston / Dena Albright6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesErin Evers vs Nancy Garrigus7-5, 6-1
2025-07-21vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErin Evers / Grace Wright vs Nancy Garrigus / Angela Rooding7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Hamilton / Heidi McCullough vs Dena Albright / Desiree Pimentel6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-14vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Kaufman / Erin Evers vs Katie Ralston / Ginger Opp6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKatherine Proctor vs Lauren Mirich2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Hamilton / Rachael Degraffenried vs Angela Rooding / Nancy Garrigus3-6, 3-6
2025-07-07vs BASALT BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Kaufman / Kate Dehm vs Dena Albright / Katie Ralston3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Hamilton / Rachael Degraffenried vs Audrey Allen / Nancy Garrigus5-7, 3-6
2025-06-30vs BASALT BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesGrace Wright / Katherine Proctor vs Lauren Mirich / Ginger Opp6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi McCullough / Rachael Degraffenried vs Nancy Garrigus / Angela Rooding1-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Davis / Grace Wright vs Dena Albright / Lauren Mirich6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErin Evers vs Nancy Garrigus6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Courtney Little
published 2.5
2.37
Grace Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Kate Dehm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Katherine Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.09
Rachael Degraffenried
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.09
Heidi McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Evers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Wright + Katherine Proctor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Courtney Little
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Grace Wright
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Kate Dehm
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Katherine Proctor
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Rachael Degraffenried
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Heidi McCullough
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Erin Evers
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.