Teams

SFV Rocket Rackets

2022 Mixed 40 & Over - SFV · SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-26vs SFV Up Your AlleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Pivnik / Miki Lorentz vs Greg Siegel / Karen Gouveia6-7, 2-6
2022-05-28vs SFV Porter ValleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Pivnik / Hope Jones vs Charles Stevens / Kendra Corrigan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRemy Carroll / Jason Pivnik vs Kristine Puno / Scott Whitmer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHope Jones / Shimon Nofar vs Judy Maly / John Maly1-6, 4-6
2022-04-24vs SFV Porter ValleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Pivnik / Barbara Wiesener vs Dhruv Sareen / Teri Lorenzo4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShimon Nofar / Remy Carroll vs Jeff Bailes / Danielle Newman3-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs SFV Bangers and SmashLost 01
L#1 DoublesIan Gocka / Miki Lorentz vs Dennis Mitchell / Mikaela Nagler2-6, 2-6
2022-04-03vs SFV Up Your AlleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesShimon Nofar / Remy Carroll vs Sunny Trinh / Kristy Swailes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Pivnik / Stefanie Wah vs Gary Weinzimer / Karen Gouveia1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Shimon Nofar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Richard Lorentz
published
3.42
Jason Pivnik
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Stefanie Wah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Ian Gocka
published 3.5
3.16
Gus Batista
published 3.5
2.87
Connie Benveniste
published 3.5
2.82
Rosie Casillas
published
2.78
Joanne Carlsen
published
2.76
Miki Lorentz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Hope Jones
published 3
Jonathan Sydes
published
Remy Carroll
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shimon Nofar
217W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.86
Richard Lorentz
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Jason Pivnik
32W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Stefanie Wah
149W–129L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Ian Gocka
54W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Gus Batista
2W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Connie Benveniste
2W–21L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.87
Rosie Casillas
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Joanne Carlsen
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Miki Lorentz
84W–98L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Hope Jones
3W–20L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Jonathan Sydes
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Remy Carroll
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.