Teams

SFV Porter Valley

2022 Mixed 40 & Over - SFV · SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesDhruv Sareen / Michele Venegas vs Patricia Dunn / Edward Hatch6-0, 7-6
2022-06-18vs SFV Up Your AlleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDhruv Sareen / Michele Venegas vs Sunny Trinh / Kristy Swailes6-7, 5-7
2022-06-04vs SFV Bangers and SmashWon 10
W#3 DoublesDhruv Sareen / Michele Venegas vs Robert Clark / MJ Nejad6-2, 6-2
2022-05-28vs SFV Rocket RacketsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Stevens / Kendra Corrigan vs Jason Pivnik / Hope Jones7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-01vs SFV Bangers and SmashLost 01
L#2 DoublesKendra Corrigan / Charles Stevens vs Kathrina Cruz / Tibor Racz6-7, 3-6
2022-04-24vs SFV Rocket RacketsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDhruv Sareen / Teri Lorenzo vs Jason Pivnik / Barbara Wiesener4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Goss / Dhruv Sareen vs Anna Gray / Adam Fine4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - 8.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Dhruv Sareen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Shane Duffy
published
4.03
Evan Press
published 4.5
3.89
Maureen Shideh
published
3.45
Michelle Halpern
published
3.20
Michele Venegas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
David Berkowitz
published 3.5
Jeff Bailes
published
Kendra Corrigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 0
Kent Goss
published
Mike Gollom
published
Teri Lorenzo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Venegas + Dhruv Sareen5355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dhruv Sareen
71W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Shane Duffy
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Evan Press
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
Maureen Shideh
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Michelle Halpern
25W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Michele Venegas
97W–95L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
David Berkowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Jeff Bailes
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Kendra Corrigan
57W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kent Goss
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Gollom
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teri Lorenzo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.