Tusa-18/5.5/M-Tchefuncta

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92

Chris Tusa

usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3

2.14

Baldwin Barkerding

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5

1.90

Cameron Woodward

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5

—

Jordan Heltz

usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Justin Clinton

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Kevin Alario

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Mike Morgan

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

—

Nathaniel Parks

usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published —

—

Ross Ledoux

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Alario + Justin Clinton	0–5	19% games	not enough data
Kevin Alario + Mike Morgan	1–3	4 matches	not enough data
Chris Tusa + Nathaniel Parks	0–4	4 matches	not enough data
Baldwin Barkerding + Mike Morgan	1–3	4 matches	not enough data
Kevin Alario + Ross Ledoux	0–3	3 matches	not enough data
Kevin Alario + Nathaniel Parks	0–3	3 matches	not enough data
Chris Tusa + Mike Morgan	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Ross Ledoux + Jordan Heltz	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Chris Tusa

8W–36L career · 16 lines in 2026

<1%72%28%

2.92

2.5

Baldwin Barkerding

2W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026

0%>99%<1%

2.14

2.5

Cameron Woodward

0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026

0%>99%<1%

1.90

—

Jordan Heltz

3W–14L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Justin Clinton

1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Kevin Alario

1W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mike Morgan

5W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Nathaniel Parks

0W–19L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ross Ledoux

5W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.