Teams

Klocek-18/5.5/M/Genesis

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 2.60 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 9 6:00 PM
North Cypress Fitness
Sep 19 8:00 AM
Tchefuncta Country Club
Sep 23 6:00 PM
Beau Chene Country Club
Sep 26 9:45 AM
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 7 6:00 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
2026-08-29Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGable Fortune / Michael Bouche vs Kevin Alario / Mike Morgan3-6, 4-6
2026-08-26vs Faucheux-18/5.5/M-Beau CheneWon 10
W#3 DoublesMason Anthony / R Timothy Brown vs Kyle Pagan / Rhett Reynolds6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Cox-18/5.5/M-N. CypressWon 20
W#2 DoublesLandon Brown / Valentin Cassan vs John Ross Donnes / Connor Seale1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexander Klocek / Mason Anthony vs Alan Cox / Cameron Robichaux6-0, 6-2
2026-08-08vs Faucheux-18/5.5/M-Beau CheneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGable Fortune / Valentin Cassan vs Aric Dunaway / Daniel Hamala7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteven Hart / Michael Bouche vs David Collins / Kyle Pagan0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Klocek-18/5.5/M/Genesis2042550
2Faucheux-18/5.5/M-Beau Chene1142437
3Cox-18/5.5/M-N. Cypress1142538
4Tusa-18/5.5/M-Tchefuncta02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Alexander Klocek
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Alexander Mata Iv
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.36
Alexander Vichinsky
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.26
Andrew Steen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Al Bourgeois
published 2.5
Eric Tagesen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Gable Fortune
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jason Ortis
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Landon Brown
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Mason Anthony
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Bouche
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
R Timothy Brown
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
Steven Hart
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 16% · published
Valentin Cassan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Motichek + Alexander Mata Iv033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexander Klocek
7W–5L career · type M · 9 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Alexander Mata Iv
14W–30L career · type S · 30 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
2.5
Alexander Vichinsky
5W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.36
2.5
Andrew Steen
1W–2L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Al Bourgeois
no matches on record · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Eric Tagesen
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gable Fortune
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Ortis
14W–33L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Landon Brown
9W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mason Anthony
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Bouche
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
R Timothy Brown
16W–33L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Hart
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Travis Motichek
15W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valentin Cassan
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.