Teams

Turner-Woodcreek

2026 SCTA Summer '26 - Southern Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-27vs Summer Smashers-HighgroveLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaisy Chi / Alexandra Mundo vs Jennifer Dorrien / Autumn Cheely6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Koelsch / Vanessa Siguenza vs Dina Slater / Ashley Sams6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTricia Jacoby / Lesa Dugas vs Katherine Patman / Kelli Bailey3-6, 5-7
2026-07-20vs Summit Family YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Jacoby / Kathy Wilson vs Judi Alvey / Nancy Black6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Turner / Denise Hofrichter vs Amanda Foster / Mischell Byers4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVanessa Siguenza / Amy Groft vs Cathy Turner / Marianne DeBondt6-7, 2-6
2026-07-06vs Summer Smashers-HighgroveLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmie Craddock / Daisy Chi vs Autumn Cheely / Tamara LeClair6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Koelsch / Lesa Dugas vs Jennifer Dorrien / Lana Holt1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Turner / Alexandra Mundo vs Briana Rider / Kristin Robertson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-29vs Summit Family YMCALost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Mundo / Kathy Turner vs Cathy Turner / Marianne DeBondt2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesVeronica Wood / Carol Corrigan vs Kelley Welden / Nancy Black4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVanessa Siguenza / Tricia Jacoby vs Amanda Foster / Lesley Jones2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-15vs Summer Smashers-HighgroveLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Hofrichter / Veronica Wood vs Brooke Gammill / Jennifer Dorrien2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Turner / Vanessa Siguenza vs Ashley Jackson / Autumn Cheely6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaisy Chi / Amie Craddock vs Briana Rider / Ashley Sams4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-08vs Summit Family YMCAWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaisy Chi / Amie Craddock vs Nancy Black / Paula Hasberger6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Koelsch / Denise Hofrichter vs Marianne DeBondt / Denise Jackson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTricia Jacoby / Tammy Goebeler vs Amanda Foster / Cathy Turner6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Michelle Koelsch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Daisy Chi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Veronica Wood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Tricia Jacoby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Amy Groft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Juliet Skonberg
published
3.00
Lesa Dugas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Alexandra Mundo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Tammy Goebeler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Hannah Gleaton
published
2.91
Vanessa Siguenza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Denise Hofrichter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Amie Craddock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Carol Corrigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathy Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Goebeler + Vanessa Siguenza6259% games+11.3% vs expected
Carol Corrigan + Vanessa Siguenza3254% gamesnot enough data
Amy Groft + Veronica Wood3256% gamesnot enough data
Carol Corrigan + Tammy Goebeler123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Corrigan + Denise Hofrichter033 matchesnot enough data
Denise Hofrichter + Alexandra Mundo213 matchesnot enough data
Amie Craddock + Daisy Chi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Koelsch
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Daisy Chi
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Veronica Wood
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Tricia Jacoby
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amy Groft
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Juliet Skonberg
16W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Lesa Dugas
24W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Alexandra Mundo
24W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Tammy Goebeler
29W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Hannah Gleaton
16W–15L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Vanessa Siguenza
23W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Denise Hofrichter
22W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Amie Craddock
18W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Carol Corrigan
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Kathy Turner
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Wilson
5W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.