Teams

Summer Smashers-Highgrove

2026 SCTA Summer '26 - Southern Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-27vs Turner-WoodcreekWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Dorrien / Autumn Cheely vs Daisy Chi / Alexandra Mundo4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDina Slater / Ashley Sams vs Michelle Koelsch / Vanessa Siguenza1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Patman / Kelli Bailey vs Tricia Jacoby / Lesa Dugas6-3, 7-5
2026-07-13vs Summit Family YMCASplit 11
L#1 DoublesAutumn Cheely / Tamara LeClair vs Kelley Welden / Nancy Black2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Gammill / Kerri Edwards vs Mischell Byers / Amanda Foster4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-06vs Turner-WoodcreekWon 21
W#1 DoublesAutumn Cheely / Tamara LeClair vs Amie Craddock / Daisy Chi4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Dorrien / Lana Holt vs Michelle Koelsch / Lesa Dugas6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBriana Rider / Kristin Robertson vs Kathy Turner / Alexandra Mundo7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-22vs Summit Family YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesKelli Bailey / Kerri Edwards vs Nancy Black / Kelley Welden1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Dorrien / Ashley Sams vs Marianne DeBondt / Denise Jackson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Robertson / Katherine Patman vs Lesley Jones / Paula Hasberger6-4, 6-4
2026-06-15vs Turner-WoodcreekWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrooke Gammill / Jennifer Dorrien vs Denise Hofrichter / Veronica Wood6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Jackson / Autumn Cheely vs Kathy Turner / Vanessa Siguenza7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBriana Rider / Ashley Sams vs Daisy Chi / Amie Craddock6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-01vs Summit Family YMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesDina Slater / Ashley Sams vs Paula Hasberger / Mischell Byers6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Patman / Kelli Bailey vs Nancy Black / Judi Alvey6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKerri Edwards / Lana Holt vs Denise Jackson / Marianne DeBondt6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Ashley Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Jennifer Dorrien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Katherine Patman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Briana Rider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Lindsay Hepler
published
3.36
Tamara LeClair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Nicole Norris
published
3.22
Kerri Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Dina Slater
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Autumn Cheely
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.04
Brooke Gammill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Ashley Sams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Kelli Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Lana Holt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Amanda Moberly
published 3
2.70
Kristin Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Gammill + Autumn Cheely171951% games+8.9% vs expected
Ashley Sams + Kelli Bailey7356% games+6.8% vs expected
Briana Rider + Ashley Jackson22374% games+4.9% vs expected
Katherine Patman + Kerri Edwards2354% games+0.1% vs expected
Kerri Edwards + Tamara LeClair1639% gamesnot enough data
Brooke Gammill + Lana Holt224 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Robertson + Lana Holt134 matchesnot enough data
Autumn Cheely + Lana Holt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Jackson
33W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Jennifer Dorrien
25W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Katherine Patman
36W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Briana Rider
32W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Lindsay Hepler
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Tamara LeClair
44W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Nicole Norris
10W–19L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Kerri Edwards
42W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Dina Slater
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Autumn Cheely
33W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Brooke Gammill
27W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Ashley Sams
33W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kelli Bailey
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lana Holt
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amanda Moberly
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristin Robertson
23W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.