Teams

WNC Qualifying Team

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 55+ Adult Men 9.0 Mon

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-09vs WNCR Talley (Etowah)Won 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Riley / Steven Tobolsky vs Thomas Kimball / Jonathan Robinson3-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Burton / Jeff Futch vs Chris Barcklow / Jeffrey Shuler9-8
2026-04-25vs WNCR Talley (Etowah)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Tobolsky / James Wilson vs Craig Hall / Charles Lee0-8
L#2 DoublesAndrew McIntyre / Stephen Riley vs Jim Downing / Carl M Erikson4-8
2026-04-25vs WNCR Talley (Etowah)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Burton / Jeff Futch vs Chris Barcklow / Jeffrey Shuler9-8
L#2 DoublesAndrew McIntyre / Stephen Riley vs Jim Downing / Carl M Erikson4-8
L#3 DoublesSteven Tobolsky / James Wilson vs Craig Hall / Charles Lee3-8
2026-04-18vs WNCR Talley (Etowah)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSam Smith / Craig Wassenberg vs Jim Downing / Robert Schry3-8
L#2 DoublesStephen Riley / Steven Tobolsky vs Jonathan Robinson / Randy Talley2-8
2026-04-18vs WNCR Talley (Etowah)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSam Smith / Craig Wassenberg vs Jim Downing / Robert Schry1-8
W#2 DoublesStephen Riley / Steven Tobolsky vs Jonathan Robinson / Randy Talley9-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Adult Men 9.0 Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Andrew McIntyre
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.91
Cas Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
John Danko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Jason Spector
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Michael Burton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Craig Wassenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Henri Dallies
published
3.66
Jeff Futch
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Steven Tobolsky
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Burton + Jason Spector4152% games+3.9% vs expected
Michael Burton + Jeff Futch3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew McIntyre
33W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
4.17
4
Cas Fowler
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
John Danko
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
Jason Spector
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Michael Burton
37W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Craig Wassenberg
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Henri Dallies
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Jeff Futch
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Steven Tobolsky
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.