Teams

WNCR Talley (Etowah)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 55+ Adult Men 9.0 Mon

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-09vs WNC Qualifying TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Kimball / Jonathan Robinson vs Stephen Riley / Steven Tobolsky1-3
L#2 DoublesChris Barcklow / Jeffrey Shuler vs Michael Burton / Jeff Futch8-9
2026-04-25vs WNC Qualifying TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Hall / Charles Lee vs Steven Tobolsky / James Wilson8-0
W#2 DoublesJim Downing / Carl M Erikson vs Andrew McIntyre / Stephen Riley8-4
2026-04-25vs WNC Qualifying TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesChris Barcklow / Jeffrey Shuler vs Michael Burton / Jeff Futch8-9
W#2 DoublesJim Downing / Carl M Erikson vs Andrew McIntyre / Stephen Riley8-4
W#3 DoublesCraig Hall / Charles Lee vs Steven Tobolsky / James Wilson8-3
2026-04-18vs WNC Qualifying TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesJim Downing / Robert Schry vs Sam Smith / Craig Wassenberg8-3
W#2 DoublesJonathan Robinson / Randy Talley vs Stephen Riley / Steven Tobolsky8-2
2026-04-18vs WNC Qualifying TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJim Downing / Robert Schry vs Sam Smith / Craig Wassenberg8-1
L#2 DoublesJonathan Robinson / Randy Talley vs Stephen Riley / Steven Tobolsky7-9
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 55+ Adult Men 9.0 Mon
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCR Talley (Etowah)4196668

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carl M Erikson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Craig Hall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Jeffrey Shuler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Robert Schry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Chris Barcklow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jim Downing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jonathan Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Kimball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Downing + Robert Schry404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carl M Erikson
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Craig Hall
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Shuler
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Robert Schry
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Chris Barcklow
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jim Downing
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Robinson
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Kimball
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.