Teams

CCOC COONS

2025 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-26vs CSRC ANDERSONWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracy Coons / Mary Vanryzin vs Eliza Montoya / Marian Nelson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarol Joslin vs Aimee Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarishah Erickson / Kolsie Coleman vs Anne Hiles / Alex Folsom7-6, 6-1
2025-04-12vs CCW YOUNGWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Vanryzin / Marishah Erickson vs Leslie Leaf / Tracy Slater6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarol Joslin vs Karen Shuman1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNina Ballenger / Kelsey Hunt vs Kim Young / Irene Mo6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-04-05vs CSRC ANDERSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Coons / Mary Vanryzin vs Jenny McCabe / Carrie Gilmore6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarol Joslin vs Aimee Anderson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarishah Erickson / Blair Carter vs Eliza Montoya / Jennifer Charlier Cox3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-22vs CCW YOUNGWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Coons / Julie Raber vs Kim Young / Lori Littleford2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarishah Erickson vs Karen Shuman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Leifer / Blair Carter vs Tracy Slater / Irene Mo6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCOC COONS40841095

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Carol Joslin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Marishah Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.39
Shannon Leifer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Tracy Coons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Mary Vanryzin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Blair Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Kelsey Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Kolsie Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Julie Raber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Ballenger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Coons + Kelsey Hunt4158% games+9.1% vs expected
Kolsie Coleman + Blair Carter224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Vanryzin + Tracy Coons213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Joslin
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Marishah Erickson
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Shannon Leifer
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Tracy Coons
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Mary Vanryzin
50W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Blair Carter
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelsey Hunt
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kolsie Coleman
49W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Julie Raber
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nina Ballenger
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.