Teams

CSRC ANDERSON

2025 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-26vs CCOC COONSLost 12
W#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Marian Nelson vs Tracy Coons / Mary Vanryzin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAimee Anderson vs Carol Joslin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Hiles / Alex Folsom vs Marishah Erickson / Kolsie Coleman6-7, 1-6
2025-04-19vs CCW YOUNGWon 21
L#1 DoublesJenny McCabe / Carrie Gilmore vs Tracy Slater / Leslie Leaf3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEliza Montoya vs Meadow Humbert2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Charlier Cox / Anne Hiles vs Kim Young / Karen Shuman6-3, 6-4
2025-04-06vs CCW YOUNGLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarian Nelson / Alex Folsom vs Tracy Slater / Leslie Leaf2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Charlier Cox vs Karen Shuman6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEliza Montoya / Anne Hiles vs Kim Young / Lori Littleford7-5, 6-4
2025-04-05vs CCOC COONSLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny McCabe / Carrie Gilmore vs Tracy Coons / Mary Vanryzin4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAimee Anderson vs Carol Joslin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEliza Montoya / Jennifer Charlier Cox vs Marishah Erickson / Blair Carter3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Folsom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Eliza Montoya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Carrie Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Aimee Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Anne Hiles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Jennifer Charlier Cox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Jenny McCabe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Folsom
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Eliza Montoya
51W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Carrie Gilmore
19W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Aimee Anderson
20W–14L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Anne Hiles
20W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Jennifer Charlier Cox
84W–69L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
Jenny McCabe
1W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.