Teams

Leveris

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-16vs Gramins/Kadelbach ES 2026Won 32
L#1 DoublesScott Leveris / Alexander Tang vs Luke Knutson / Ty Shustarich0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Millard vs Ryan Kadelbach6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGarth Peterson / Harrison Porter vs Timothy Hanson / Steve Gramins1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCody Malik vs Scott Krohn7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Smyth / Kyle Syverson vs Scott Lucas / Earl Williams5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-12-09vs Sundick: Hot shots part deuceLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Tang / Luke Hawkinson vs David Hoffman / Andy Finn6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Leveris / Paul Smyth vs Ryan Rosoff / Danny Kanter2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGarth Peterson / Finn Peterson vs Jeremy Edwards / Edgar Rapoport7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-12-02vs Torres: The DropshotsWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Parker / Cody Malik vs Brian Reidinger / Craig Ballentine6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJoseph Millard vs Paul Jensen6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesScott Leveris / Alexander Tang vs Noah Anderson / Zachary Irrthum4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesFei Li vs Juraj Huska1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLuke Hawkinson / Paul Smyth vs Tong Shen / Aaron Judd6-4, 6-0
2025-11-18vs 2026 - Farrell/Birch - WBL AcesLost 05
L#1 DoublesCody Malik / Luke Hawkinson vs Kristopher Birch / Matthew Knutson4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph Millard vs Carter Lyons4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Smyth / Scott Leveris vs Hal Voges / Jon Kruse5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesFei Li vs Barrett HIndt1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHarrison Porter / Kyle Syverson vs Jeff Myhre / Nicholas Oris0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLuke Hawkinson / Craig Markovitz vs Jason Bednar / Jonathan Hawkinson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCody Malik vs Ryan Curtin6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Smyth / Alexander Tang vs Lonny Wittnebel / Brian Kasel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesScott Leveris vs Samuel Jackson6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCraig Markovitz / Cody Malik vs John Simon / An Phan3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoseph Millard vs Jay Knutson6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGarth Peterson / Finn Peterson vs Dave Johnson / Jakob Strawhecker6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesFei Li vs Matt Hauwiller3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHarrison Porter / Paul Smyth vs Ian Gideon / Jimmy Maomanyvanh7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-28vs Jordan: TBC V1Lost 23
L#1 DoublesCraig Markovitz / Scott Leveris vs Timothy Ohtake / Ramon Villanueva6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoseph Millard vs Tan Nguyen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Parker / Gary Parker vs Senan Kelly / Quang Nystrom3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesFei Li vs Preston Husom7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlexander Tang / Paul Smyth vs Otto Sanchez / Connor Remington6-2, 7-6
2025-10-21vs Gramins/Kadelbach ES 2026Lost 23
L#1 DoublesMichael Parker / Gary Parker vs Tom Shustarich / Ty Shustarich6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Margulis vs Ryan Kadelbach3-3
W#2 DoublesGarth Peterson / Craig Markovitz vs Scott Krohn / Thomas James7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKyle Syverson vs Steve Gramins2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlexander Tang / Paul Smyth vs Earl Williams / Lewis Yang7-5, 6-3
2025-10-14vs Sundick: Hot shots part deuceLost 14
W#1 DoublesLuke Hawkinson / Alexander Tang vs Ryan Rosoff / Tyler Hoffman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Margulis vs Manuel Hanuch3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMason West / Harrison Porter vs Danny Kanter / Miguel Padilla1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesFei Li vs Jared Greenbaum0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGarth Peterson / Finn Peterson vs Edgar Rapoport / Adam Moss6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Torres: The DropshotsWon 32
W#1 DoublesMichael Parker / Luke Hawkinson vs Joe Eiler / Zachary Molumby6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCody Malik vs Paul Jensen6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMason West / Alexander Tang vs Noah Anderson / Zachary Irrthum6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichael Margulis vs Juraj Huska6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Smyth / Joseph Millard vs Michael Torres / Chris Sullivan6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chase ES82361436401
22026 - Farrell/Birch - WBL Aces73351539382
3Sundick: Hot shots part deuce73292153449
4Magistad/Birkeland ES 2664302047432
5Duwearatchi/Ballentine - 4.0 (18+) ES64302050423
6Gramins/Kadelbach ES 202655282248415
7Jilek/Elfstrum 18+ ES55262450445
8Lassow/Walker 18+ ES 2655232763471
9Ostlund/Tuplano TBC v2 18+ 4.0 ES2646193165478
10Leveris46193165483
11Anderson/Holcomb Fall37173375525

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Luke Hawkinson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.95
Cody Malik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.94
Joseph Millard
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Finn Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Craig Markovitz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Alexander Tang
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Scott Leveris
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.72
Garth Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.65
Kyle Syverson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.61
Michael Margulis
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.52
Fei Li
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.48
Harrison Porter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Paul Smyth
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
3.10
Mason West
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Parker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexander Tang + Cody Malik5060% games+3.0% vs expected
Finn Peterson + Garth Peterson2451% games−2.8% vs expected
Cody Malik + Luke Hawkinson7256% games−6.8% vs expected
Paul Smyth + Harrison Porter044 matchesnot enough data
Paul Smyth + Alexander Tang404 matchesnot enough data
Alexander Tang + Luke Hawkinson404 matchesnot enough data
Craig Markovitz + Garth Peterson224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Smyth + Scott Leveris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Hawkinson
29W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
4.15
4
Cody Malik
28W–11L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Joseph Millard
29W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Finn Peterson
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Craig Markovitz
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Alexander Tang
51W–23L career · 16 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Scott Leveris
15W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Garth Peterson
17W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kyle Syverson
11W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Michael Margulis
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.61
Fei Li
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Harrison Porter
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Paul Smyth
22W–21L career · 17 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Mason West
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Gary Parker
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.