Teams

Magistad/Birkeland ES 26

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-16vs Farber Net ResultsLost 23
L#1 DoublesBrett Kirchoff / Adam Segal vs Noah Farber / Spencer DeVeau4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLuke Jordan vs Hui Huang6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Birkeland / James Elvestrom vs Dan Westerhaus / Brian Harrison6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAndre Hodder vs Jonathan Farber3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Magistad / Parker Lahr vs Vaughn Smith / Matthew McCann2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-12-09vs Anderson/Holcomb FallWon 50
W#1 DoublesScott Birkeland / Mitchell Fortney vs Luke Anderson / David Fielder6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLuke Jordan vs Will Holcomb7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Nelson / James Elvestrom vs Ryan Albu / Mark Gness6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAndre Hodder vs Joseph McGonigle6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnthony Magistad / Brett Kirchoff vs Arnold Ringstad / Wei Feng6-3, 6-4
2025-12-02vs Jilek/Elfstrum 18+ ESLost 23
W#1 DoublesLuke Jordan / Adam Segal vs Justin Graham / Greg Elfstrum6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMitchell Fortney vs Justin Beneke6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Nelson / James Elvestrom vs Paul Jilek / Chad Engel5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJulian Acosta vs Matt Bartell4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesParker Lahr / Jackson Barber vs Benjamin Colburn / Alan Stratton2-6, 2-6
2025-11-18vs Fermstad: LakeVillainsWon 32
W#1 DoublesLuke Jordan / Jeff Nelson vs Luke Sachse / Jonathon Lansink6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMitchell Fortney vs Wyatt Sherwood6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackson Barber / Mark Magistad vs Eric Kidd / Lucas Tesh7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAndre Hodder vs Matthew Cotner7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrent Fredrickson / Amit Sharma vs Ian Klein / Brendan Klein5-7, 0-6
W#1 DoublesMitchell Fortney / Adam Segal vs Leif Johnson / Per Ostlund6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLuke Jordan vs Guang Yang6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesScott Birkeland / Andre Hodder vs Kaushal Kalyanasundaram / Kailash Kalyanasundaram6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJulian Acosta vs Alex Chou6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesParker Lahr / Anthony Magistad vs Max Shaughnessy / Dan Swanson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-04vs Chase ESLost 14
L#1 DoublesMitchell Fortney / Adam Segal vs Jason Thiner / Mark Nazarevych2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLuke Jordan vs Ryan Lum6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Birkeland / Jeff Nelson vs Matthew Chu / Julian Hommeyer4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAndre Hodder vs Brian Weber2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Kirchoff / Amit Sharma vs Phillip Chase / Paul Schoenecker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-28vs Farber Net ResultsWon 41
W#1 DoublesLuke Jordan / Adam Segal vs Spencer DeVeau / Dan Westerhaus6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMitchell Fortney vs Sam Coombe6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJackson Barber / Mark Magistad vs Matthew McCann / Noah Nguyen3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJulian Acosta vs Noah Farber7-5, 4-2
W#3 DoublesBrett Kirchoff / Anthony Magistad vs Vaughn Smith / Jonathan Farber6-4, 6-3
2025-10-21vs Lassow/Walker 18+ ES 26Won 50
W#1 DoublesLuke Jordan / Adam Segal vs Nick Rindo / Benjamin Rindo7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMitchell Fortney vs Michael Marek6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesScott Birkeland / Jeff Nelson vs Gaylon Rust / Joe Vogel6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAndre Hodder vs Manish Patel6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Magistad / Jackson Barber vs Richard Lassow / Nick Welch6-4, 6-2
2025-10-14vs Anderson/Holcomb FallWon 32
L#1 DoublesJeff Nelson / Adam Segal vs Luke Anderson / Will Holcomb1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLuke Jordan vs Tomas Benzo6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackson Barber / Mark Magistad vs Washington Helps / Wei Feng6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAndre Hodder vs Joseph McGonigle6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulian Acosta / Parker Lahr vs Sam Gullick / Arnold Ringstad6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-07vs Jilek/Elfstrum 18+ ESLost 23
W#1 DoublesLuke Jordan / Adam Segal vs Greg Elfstrum / Justin Graham6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesScott Birkeland vs Justin Beneke1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrett Kirchoff / Jeff Nelson vs Benjamin Colburn / Alan Stratton3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAndre Hodder vs Matt Olson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulian Acosta / Mark Magistad vs Kenneth Gutzman / Luke Utrie3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chase ES82361436401
22026 - Farrell/Birch - WBL Aces73351539382
3Sundick: Hot shots part deuce73292153449
4Magistad/Birkeland ES 2664302047432
5Duwearatchi/Ballentine - 4.0 (18+) ES64302050423
6Gramins/Kadelbach ES 202655282248415
7Jilek/Elfstrum 18+ ES55262450445
8Lassow/Walker 18+ ES 2655232763471
9Ostlund/Tuplano TBC v2 18+ 4.0 ES2646193165478
10Leveris46193165483
11Anderson/Holcomb Fall37173375525

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Luke Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.98
Mitchell Fortney
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.85
Scott Birkeland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.80
Adam Segal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
James Elvestrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jackson Barber
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Andre Hodder
usually #2 Singles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.68
Brett Kirchoff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Julian Acosta
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Mark Magistad
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Anthony Magistad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Brent Fredrickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Parker Lahr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackson Barber + Mark Magistad4162% games+9.0% vs expected
Parker Lahr + Anthony Magistad1644% games−4.0% vs expected
Scott Birkeland + Mark Magistad2341% games−13.9% vs expected
Adam Segal + Luke Jordan404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Jordan
35W–17L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
Mitchell Fortney
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
Scott Birkeland
16W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Adam Segal
6W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
James Elvestrom
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Jackson Barber
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Andre Hodder
12W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Brett Kirchoff
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Julian Acosta
3W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Mark Magistad
13W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Anthony Magistad
4W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Brent Fredrickson
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Parker Lahr
9W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.