Teams

BRMST SILVER

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-29vs CVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan Golden / John Stewart vs Luke Trautwein / Dave Hwang0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Fazzini / Russell Hogan vs Sean Kracklauer / Lance Olson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-22vs BRMST NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Fazzini / Kenneth Swanwick vs Jason Brown / Joel Walter5-7, 5-7
2023-08-15vs BTA-CU GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan Golden / Kenneth Swanwick vs Rick Killian / Scott Belding6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRussell Hogan / Andrew Sinsel vs David Corujo / Joe Teasdale3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-13vs NJ REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKenneth Swanwick / Andrew Sinsel vs Amal Chandran / Sean Mitchell6-1, 7-6
2023-08-08vs TTA-E GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesDan Golden / Andrew Sinsel vs Steven Allscheid / Russ Hamilton6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-29vs BRMST ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesRussell Hogan / Robert Tedesco vs Scott Lilleston / Scott Sutton6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDan Golden / Andrew Sinsel vs Thomas Rogers / Steve Horace2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Paul Billings
published
3.34
Kenneth Swanwick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Dan Golden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Andrew Sinsel
published 3.5
3.20
Russell Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Robert Tedesco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Hogan + Kenneth Swanwick3551% games+2.4% vs expected
Russell Hogan + Dan Golden4453% gamesnot enough data
Dan Golden + Kenneth Swanwick404 matchesnot enough data
Robert Tedesco + Dan Golden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Billings
26W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Kenneth Swanwick
63W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Dan Golden
45W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Sinsel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Russell Hogan
46W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Robert Tedesco
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.