Teams

BRMST ORANGE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05vs TTA-E GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephane Billat / Chip Murphy vs Russ Hamilton / Joey Garcia6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-29vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesChip Murphy / Thomas Rogers vs Amal Chandran / Conor Hansen2-6, 3-6
2023-08-22vs BTA-CU GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesThomas Rogers / Chip Murphy vs Marc Dolezal / Chris Barge2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStephane Billat vs Scott Belding0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHerb Covey / Steve Horace vs Derek Rikke / John Viloria4-6, 0-6
2023-08-15vs TTA-E YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephane Billat / Scott Lilleston vs Jeffrey Galloway / Frederick Longobricco3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChip Murphy / Steve Horace vs Thorsten Ohrstrom Sandgren / Dave Kulmann4-6, 3-6
2023-08-08vs CVTA REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Lilleston / Steve Horace vs Luke Trautwein / Lance Olson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephane Billat / Chip Murphy vs Michael Yelvington / Matthias van de Liefvoort6-4, 7-5
2023-08-01vs BRMST NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesChip Murphy / Herb Covey vs Glenn Fleckenstein / Kent MacLennan2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesStephane Billat vs Drew Carroll1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Lilleston / Steve Horace vs Thomas Quinn / Joel Walter1-6, 2-6
2023-07-29vs BRMST SILVERSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephane Billat vs Brad Thurman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Rogers / Steve Horace vs Dan Golden / Andrew Sinsel6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Scott Lilleston
published
3.38
Steve Horace
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Stephane Billat
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Thomas Rogers
published
2.92
Chip Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.71
David Ipsen
published 3
Herb Covey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephane Billat + David Ipsen2339% gamesnot enough data
Stephane Billat + Chip Murphy213 matchesnot enough data
David Ipsen + Chip Murphy033 matchesnot enough data
Chip Murphy + Steve Horace033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Lilleston
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Steve Horace
43W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Stephane Billat
98W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Thomas Rogers
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Chip Murphy
14W–44L career · 6 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
David Ipsen
31W–74L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Herb Covey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.