Teams

KDay (OPRC)

2025 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Wed PM

9 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-30vs ACombs (BCC)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAngie Mehrizi vs Kate MacRone4-6, 0-6
2025-07-23Won 10
W#3 SinglesAmber Filingeri vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-16vs RDuffy/SOsadnick (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#2 SinglesAngie Mehrizi vs Debbie Glass6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAmber Filingeri vs Cynthia Mitsumasu6-3, 6-0
2025-07-09vs KCurley/SMacVicar (Raintree)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesStacey Valitchka vs Suzanne MacVicar7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs ETurkus (Springfield)Split 11
W#1 SinglesStacey Valitchka vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAngie Mehrizi vs Natalie Costello2-6, 0-6
2025-06-25vs ACombs (BCC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Kate MacRone4-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesAmber Filingeri vs Amy Combs6-1, 6-0
2025-06-11vs CWarner/JZarambo (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Jamie Zarambo2-6, 3-6
2025-06-11Won 10
W#3 SinglesAmber Filingeri vs Katrina Gustafson6-1, 6-4
2025-05-28vs ETurkus (Springfield)Split 11
L#1 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Erica Turkus4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAngie Mehrizi vs Annmarie Ringle6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.94
Anne Schmitt
published 3
2.83
Amber Filingeri
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Angie Mehrizi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Heather Dineen
published
2.64
Kristen Day
published
2.57
Stacey Valitchka
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.56
Surabhi Chopra
published
2.35
Annabet Smith
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Mehrizi + Amber Filingeri5165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
58W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Anne Schmitt
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Amber Filingeri
37W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Angie Mehrizi
44W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Heather Dineen
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Kristen Day
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%16%84%
2.64
3
Stacey Valitchka
22W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Surabhi Chopra
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
2.5
Annabet Smith
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.