Teams

BRMST GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-08vs MEA BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoel Walter / Drew Carroll vs William Sivy / Danny Wages6-3, 6-2
2025-07-03vs BTA-F GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / Mark Korth vs Graham Carlson / Reed Mayne2-4
2025-07-01vs LTA-Q BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Korth / Drew Carroll vs Michael Matheson / Daniel Ohlsen2-6, 2-6
2025-06-17vs TTA GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoel Walter / Drew Carroll vs Kevin Darby / John Daniel Singaram7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames White / Philip Cangilla vs Joey Garcia / Michael Ely2-6, 5-7
2025-06-03vs NJ SILVERWon 10
W#3 DoublesDrew Carroll / Philip Cangilla vs Peter Malouff / John Hamilton6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
David Hartwell
published 3.5
3.31
Thomas Quinn
published
3.29
John Post
published
3.22
Joel Walter
published
3.15
Drew Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
James White
published
2.96
Stephen Sutphin
published
2.95
Tim Dronkers
published
2.79
Philip Cangilla
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dolf Kahle
published
Mark Korth
published
Steven Comeau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Cangilla + Drew Carroll224 matchesnot enough data
Philip Cangilla + Joel Walter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Hartwell
7W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Thomas Quinn
19W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
John Post
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Joel Walter
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Drew Carroll
84W–112L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
James White
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Stephen Sutphin
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Tim Dronkers
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Philip Cangilla
17W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Dolf Kahle
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Korth
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Comeau
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.