Teams

LTA-Q BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs BTA-F GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeff Rodanski / Scott Nguyen vs Niels Damrauer / Daniel Angst6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMichael Matheson vs Stuart Dimson7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Walker / Daniel Ohlsen vs Bill Dietz / John Koval6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRonan Heaney / Marc Levinson vs Graham Carlson / Stephen Richter6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs TTA GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Rodanski / Ari Finkelstein vs Kevin Darby / Randy Bell6-1, 6-2
2025-07-01vs BRMST GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Matheson / Daniel Ohlsen vs Mark Korth / Drew Carroll6-2, 6-2
2025-06-28vs NJ SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Walker / Jeff Rodanski vs Kevin Thistle / Peter Malouff6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Matheson / Marc Levinson vs Scott Sweeney / Tim Doherty4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-17vs NJ REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Matheson / Marc Levinson vs Ernest Reece / Morey Walker6-0, 6-2
2025-06-10vs MEA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Rodanski / James Walker vs John Ruder / Andy Pobywajlo3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Matheson vs Chris Gray4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Ari Finkelstein
published 4
3.67
Ronan Heaney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jeff Rodanski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Daniel Ohlsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Michael Matheson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Stewart Wedge
published
3.38
Venugopal Garuda
published
Marc Levinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Matheson + Jeff Rodanski5156% games+2.5% vs expected
Venugopal Garuda + Jeff Rodanski123 matchesnot enough data
Ari Finkelstein + Marc Levinson303 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Rodanski + Stewart Wedge303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ari Finkelstein
32W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Ronan Heaney
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Jeff Rodanski
127W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
3.5
Daniel Ohlsen
35W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Michael Matheson
88W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Stewart Wedge
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Venugopal Garuda
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Marc Levinson
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.